Ford Medical Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ford Medical Practice on 5 March 2020 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we followed up on breaches of regulations identified at a previous inspection on 10 January 2019.

This inspection looked at the following key questions:

Safe

Effective

Caring

Responsive

Well-led

At the last inspection in January 2019 we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe and well-led services because:

• Systems and processes for checking on areas of practice were not sufficiently robust. This included in areas such as safeguarding, staff training, staff recruitment practices, the provision of minor surgery, the management of health and safety, the management of patient safety alerts and security of prescriptions.
• Governance systems were not fully effective in monitoring the service, managing risks and driving improvement.

At this inspection we found that the provider had satisfactorily addressed the above areas.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

• what we found when we inspected
• information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
• information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

• The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
• Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
• Staff dealt with patients with respect.
• The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs.
• The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of good quality care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulation, the provider should:

• Review the arrangements for checking patients referred for tests under the urgent rule have attended their appointment.
• Continue to encourage patients to uptake cancer screening.
• Carry out a risk assessment to support the decision as to the emergency medicines held.
• Ensure prescriptions are secured appropriately outside of opening hours.
• Continue to encourage uptake of patients to form a Patient Participation Group.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ford Medical Practice on 10 January 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

• What we found when we inspected
• Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
• Information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as requires improvement overall. We rated the practice as requires improvement for the population group families, children and young people and good for the remaining population groups.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

• The practice did not have appropriate systems and processes in place for safeguarding children.
• A number of health and safety related checks were not being followed as required.
• Staff recruitment and selection practices were not always sufficiently robust.
• There was no system to ensure histology results were received for patients following minor surgery.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing well-led services because:

• The overall governance arrangements were not fully effective.
• We saw little evidence of systems and processes for checking on areas of practice such as safeguarding, staff training, the provision of minor surgery, the management of safety alerts, security of prescriptions and staff recruitment practices.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective services because:

• There were patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
• The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs.

We rated the practice as good for providing caring services because:

• Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.

We rated the practice as good for providing responsive services because:

• The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs.
• Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

• Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
• Ensure patients are protected from abuse and improper treatment.
• Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
• Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training and professional development, necessary to enable them to carry out their duties.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

• Develop a programme of clinical audit including audits linked to the provision of minor surgery.
• Ensure staff training records are kept up to date and that an oversight of staff training is maintained at provider level.
• Ensure the process for making a complaint is well publicised for patients and that all complaints are managed within the provider’s policy and procedure.
• Ensure an appropriate system is in place for the management and control of hand written prescription forms in line with national guidance.
• Provide reception staff with information and guidance specific to the symptoms of sepsis.
• Review the system in place for managing patient safety alerts to evidence that appropriate action is taken in response to all relevant alerts.
• Introduce a system to audit how consent to treatment is gained.
• The practice should engage with a representative sample of the patient population through the formation of a Patient Participtation Group (PPG).

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice.