This service is rated as
Good
overall.
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? – Outstanding
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Oakdin Clinic on 22 July 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2006. The inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
The provider was previously registered as an NHS GP provider and inspected on 4 February 2015. They were rated as good in the key questions are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. The provider relinquished their NHS contract and is now an independent healthcare provider which offers specialist services such as dermatology, gynaecology, general surgery, orthopaedics, radiology and urology.
The CQC registered manager is the head of the clinic who is also the nurse in charge. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
The CQC nominated individual is the clinical director and lead consultant at the clinic. A nominated individual is a person who is registered with the CQC to supervise the management of the regulated activities and for ensuring the quality of the services provided.
Our key findings were:
- The service had clear systems to keep patients safe and safeguarded from abuse.
- Staff had the information they needed to deliver safe care and treatment to patients.
- The premises were clean and infection prevention and control was well managed with appropriate cleaning processes in place.
- The service routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the safety and quality of care it provided to ensure treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
- Patients were treated with respect and staff were kind, caring and involved them in decisions about their care.
- Patients were able to access efficient and effective care and treatment from the service, with appointments and results for scans available on the same day.
- The service demonstrated a culture which focused on the needs of patients and commitment to driving improvement.
- There was a clear leadership structure in place and staff felt supported by management.
- The service had a governance framework and had established processes for managing risks, issues and performance.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Continue to monitor non-clinical staff immunisations.
- Continue to monitor non-clinical staff training compliance for responding to medical emergencies.
- Continue to monitor and mitigate risks associated with legionella bacterium contamination of water systems.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services