• Dentist
  • Dentist

Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery

Dental Surgery, 52 Hart Road, Thundersley, Essex, SS7 3PJ (01268) 794829

Provided and run by:
Ewa Dimitrijevic

All Inspections

19 March 2024

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery on 19 March 2024. This inspection was carried out to review the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

We had previously undertaken a comprehensive inspection of Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery on 11 January 2024 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well-led care and was in breach of regulation 12 Safe, regulation 15 Premises and Equipment and regulation 17 Good Governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

  • Is it safe?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made some improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 11 January 2024.

Background

Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery is in Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 1 dentist and 1 dental nurse. The practice has 1 treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist and the dental nurse. We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Tuesday from 2pm to 8am.

Wednesday closed.

Thursday and Friday 9am to 3pm (closed from 12pm to 1pm).

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the suitability of the premises and ensure all areas are fit for the purpose for which they are being used. In particular, ensure the 5 yearly electrical installation condition examination report is undertaken.

11 January 2024

During a routine inspection

We carried out this comprehensive inspection on 11 January 2024 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions::

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared clean but surfaces in clinical areas were cluttered in a way that prevented thorough cleaning.
  • The practice had some infection control procedures which reflected published guidance. We found these were not applied consistently.
  • Staff did not know how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were not always available.
  • The practice’s systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment and the premises were ineffective. We identified shortfalls in assessing and mitigating risks in relation to fire safety, legionella management, prescription security and medicine management, radiography, the safe handling and disposal of sharps and domestic cleaning.
  • Safeguarding processes were not in place, staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children, but contact information and guidance was not available.
  • Staff recruitment procedures did not reflect current legislation.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines. However, this was not always recorded in the patient’s clinical record.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect. Staff took care to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
  • The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • The provider did not demonstrate effective leadership or support a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved, supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • The practice information governance arrangements were ineffective.

Background

Mrs E Dimitrijevic - Dental Surgery is in Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 1 dentist and 1 dental nurse. The practice has 1 treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist and the dental nurse. We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Tuesday from 2pm to 8am.

Wednesday closed.

Thursday and Friday 9am to 3pm (closed from 12pm to 1pm).

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure all premises and equipment used by the service provider is fit for use.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. In particular, ensure local rules are updated and in line with current guidelines, and ensure a rectangular collimator is available.
  • Improve the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.

18 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

When we visited the practice we found that staff were supported and had received an annual appraisal. Records held reflected that staff were on course to achieve their number of hours of continuous professional development in order to maintain their skill levels. The certificates for completion of these hours were available for us to view.

The provider was seeking the views of the people who used the service through a patient survey that had been started in January 2014. We looked at a number of the questionnaires that had been completed to date and these reflected high levels of satisfaction amongst patients. A suggestion box was also available in the reception area for people to use.

The views of staff members were sought at a team meeting held in November 2014 and minutes of this meeting had been recorded. This meeting was also used to discuss any areas for improvement that had been identified.

A complaints procedure was now in place and on display in the reception area. We noted there had been no complaints received. Records were now available for us to view. These included policies and procedures and information in relation to persons employed at the practice.

14 October 2013

During a routine inspection

When we visited the service we found that people were involved in their care and treatment and they were treated with dignity and respect. Literature was available to inform people of the types of service that were provided.

People we spoke with were positive about the care and treatment they received and they confirmed that a medical history was taken and checked when they attended for treatment. Patient records reflected the types of treatment suggested and written treatment plans had been provided for some people. One person said, "The dentist explains everything to me including any risks, options and benefits and the costs are made clear to me." Another said, "I am happy with the quality of the dental work and they are very kind and caring."

We found that infection control procedures were in line with recommended guidelines but some minor improvements were required. Cleaning schedules also needed to be in place in relation to the general cleaning of the premises.

Staff told us that they were supported in their training and continuous professional development. Staff did not receive any annual appraisals to reflect that they were competent in their role.

The provider did not have an effective system in place to assess and monitor the quality of the services they provided. This put people at risk of unsafe care and treatment.

There was an absence of policies and procedures at the practice in relation to any of the regulated activities.