• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Ultrasound Scanning Services Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

452 Church Lane, London, NW9 8UA (020) 8357 0957

Provided and run by:
Ultrasound Scanning Services Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Ultrasound Scanning Services Ltd on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Ultrasound Scanning Services Ltd, you can give feedback on this service.

23 August 2022

During a routine inspection

Our rating of this service stayed the same. We rated it as good because:

The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. The service understood how to manage safety incidents.

Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information. Key services were available to suit patients' needs.

Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.

The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.

Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems. Staff understood the service’s vision and values. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and staff were committed to improving the service.

However:

Staff did not have the complete training on how to recognise and report abuse for adults and children using or coming in contact with the service.

Some areas of the service were dusty due to renovation work and equipment was slightly unclean.

The maintenance and use of equipment were not in line with national guidance as the service did not conduct regular quality assurance tests for the ultrasound scanner and we observed some use of expired equipment for the purposes of blood tests.

05 February 2019

During a routine inspection

Ultrasound Scanning Services Ltd is operated by Ultrasound Scanning Services Ltd. The Service offers diagnostic tests in the form of ultrasounds for adults. The service has one treatment room and a reception area.

The service provides scans for; early pregnancy 3D or 4D, gender reveal, upper abdomen, pelvic, kidneys and bladder, testes, thyroid, carotid arteries, musculoskeletal such as muscles and tendons, shoulders and conditions including deep vein thrombosis.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the unannounced part of the inspection on 05 February 2019. We went back to do a planned follow up inspection on 15 February 2019.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Services we rate

We rated the service as Good overall.

We found areas of practice that was good at this diagnostic service:

  • Staff understood how to protect patients from abuse and recognise different types of abuse.

  • The cleaning wipes used for the transvaginal probe were in line with national recommendations.

  • The service reported 100% compliance in their handwashing audits.

  • Service users with a wheelchair could access the service easily, either via the ramp at the main door or at the side entrance.

  • The service complied with the pause and check guidance from the Society of Radiographers.

  • The service followed guidelines set out by the British Medical Ultrasound Society, Society of Radiographers for professional ultrasound practice and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

  • The service operated seven days a week and provided flexible appointment to meet the needs of their patients.

  • Patients we spoke with said that staff were thorough and took the time to explain findings with them.

  • Staff we spoke with stressed the importance of treating patients as individuals.

  • The service accommodated urgent referrals by ensuring that two urgent appointment slots were available every day.

  • Prices of ultrasound scans were clearly visible to service users.

  • Ultrasound reports were sent to the patient’s GP within two working days for NHS patients.

  • The service was managed by the lead radiographer who was suitably qualified for the role.

  • The service had enough staff with the right qualifications, skills and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

However,

  • Staff were not up to date in mandatory and safeguarding training.

  • The service did not hold cleaning logs of the service and we could not see documentation that supported daily cleaning.

  • The service did not have access to an interpretation service, we found that this was rectified on our follow up inspection.

  • The service did not have a documented vision or strategy.

  • The risks in the risk register did not have an entry date or a mitigated date.

  • The manager regularly audited the radiographers work but did not share feedback from these audits with staff.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it should make improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve.

Professor Edward Baker

Chief Inspector of Hospitals