1st,2nd 3rd March 2022
During a routine inspection
We carried out this short notice announced comprehensive inspection of acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU), community-based mental health services for adults of working age, specialist community mental health services for children and young people and child and adolescent inpatient wards of this trust as part of our continual checks on the safety and quality of healthcare services. At our last inspection we rated the provider as good.
We also inspected the well-led key question for the trust overall. We inspected four services and rated one as good (child and adolescent inpatient wards) and three as requires improvement (acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU), community-based mental health services for adults of working age and specialist community mental health services for children services). Overall, we rated safe, effective, responsive and well led as requires improvement. We rated caring as outstanding.
We also inspected the trust's urgent and emergency care services in February 2022 as part of our urgent and emergency care programme. The service was rated good. This report is published separately on our website.
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust delivers community health, mental health and learning disability services to people living in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly have a population of 545,000 with a higher than average aging population. This increases by an average of 300,000 during the summer holidays with a total of 41 million visitors per year. The trust runs over 80 services in 130 sites across Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. The trust has over 4,300 inpatient admissions annually across the 12 community health hospital sites and over 550 inpatient admissions to the mental health wards. The trust operates ten minor injury units with over 93,000 attendances per year. The trust employs over 4,100 staff.
Our rating of services went down. We rated them as requires improvement because:
- We rated safe, effective, responsive and well-led as requires improvement.
- We rated one of the trust’s services as good. This was the child and adolescent mental health ward (which had not previously been inspected). We rated acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit as requires improvement overall, with an inadequate rating in the safe domain. This had gone down from the rating of good given at our inspection in February 2018. We rated community-based mental health services for adults of working age as requires improvement. This had gone down from the good rating given at our last inspection in April 2019. We rated specialist community mental health services for children and young people as requires improvement, with an inadequate rating in safe. This had improved from the overall inadequate rating given following our inspection in April 2019. In rating the trust overall, we included the existing ratings of the nine previously inspected services.
- We found environments at a number of the locations we visited to be in poor condition and not fit for purpose. This was a safety risk for patients using these services. On the acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit the ward environments were not well maintained which caused staff difficulties in safely managing patients within the environments. For example, we found a ligature risk assessment on one ward that was not up to date and on two of the wards there were blindspots. On each ward there were areas of the environment that were not safe or were unfit for purpose and posed risks to the safety of the patients. All the wards we visited needed updating and maintenance work completed to make them more safe, therapeutic and comfortable for patients. For example windows on two of the wards were damaged and had been requiring repair for some months. In the specialist community mental health services for children and young people not all of the premises where young people were seen were safe, clean, well equipped, well maintained and furnished and fit for purpose. Only half of the services visited had environmental risk assessments. In one location there were ligature points such as screws protruding from the walls. In the same location furniture was not compliant with fire regulations. In the community-based mental health services for adults of working age not all of the locations we inspected were fit for purpose and required maintenance work to be undertaken. Three of the six teams inspected were located in premises that required maintenance works to be completed for issues such as damp, poor décor and damaged walls.
- The trust’s estates issues were a key risk to the organisation. The trust was experiencing significant challenges arranging maintenance works across the service. The trust only owned 16% of their estate and in some locations were reliant on external contracts. There were ongoing issues in the management of external contacts to ensure appropriate repairs were carried out in a timely fashion. Some locations were operated through PFI providers. The trust had been experiencing significant difficulties in getting the PFI provider to complete maintenance in a timely manner. The trust informed us that they believe PFI’s were performing at a standard that was considerably below the standard expected in all areas. The trust had engaged NHSE/I, DHSC and the Cabinet office to support rectification of this situation. The estates team were working through these issues and in the process of developing a strategy.
- The trust were facing workforce issues and a number of the teams we visited did not have enough staff and high vacancy rates. In the community-based mental health teams for adults of working age teams had only between 40% and 60% of the staff they should have. As a consequence, there were long waiting lists for patients to be seen and long waits for a range of therapies due to a lack of clinical psychologists and occupational therapists. The specialist community mental health services for children and young people had similar issues with staffing and the teams were not always able to provide treatments as the teams did not have access to the full range of specialist staff. Young people on the external waiting lists were not always monitored to detect, and respond to, increases in their level of risk. The acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit had high vacancy rates for registered nurses and healthcare assistants. The services had to use high numbers of agency staff to ensure shifts were filled. Patients’ escorted leave or activities were often delayed or cancelled as there weren’t enough staff to facilitate these. In addition, the wards could not always provide patients with timely access to the full range of treatment and therapy options due to a lack of clinical psychologist.
- As part of a governance review it had been identified there were issues in the way the trust was managing and investigating complaints. The trust was not classifying complaints and concerns accurately with a risk of complaints not being reviewed and investigated in line with requirements. The trust had 254 complaints open, 176 of these were outside the trust target of 60 days.
- The trust did not have a current strategy which clearly defined objectives and deliverables aligned to trust and partner strategies. The trust also had a number of strategies which were out of date at the time of the inspection, this included the estates strategy and financial strategy.
However:
- We rated the caring domain as outstanding.
- Since our last comprehensive inspection of the trust in March 2019 there had been significant changes to the trust board and a number of new appointments, including a new chair, chief executive, chief operating officer, chief medical officer, chief information officer, chief nursing officer, executive director of finance and an executive director of corporate affairs and assurance. Several members of the executive board were undertaking their first executive appointments. These board members had been offered a mentor and undertook leadership training.
- The trust executive board had a range of skills and knowledge to perform its role and deliver community health services and mental health services. The trust leadership demonstrated awareness of the priorities and challenges facing the trust and had acted at pace during the pandemic. The trust had been in a critical incident for a prolonged period of time and had been working to manage this situation.
- The trust had reviewed governance arrangements and developed a Governance Improvement Plan (GIP). The work around governance identified a number of areas that required improvement. This work had been on going and a significant number of areas related to governance had been incorporated into the GIP. Improvements were on going and were in the process of being embedded to support the overall governance structure of the organisation.
- The director of governance had identified areas of improvement required around risk management within the trust. An internal audit had validated these findings. The trust had taken steps to address this and developed a new risk management strategy which incorporated policy requirements. The implementation of the policy trust wide was early in its adoption and the trust were in the process of embedding a new risk management structure. There was a positive change in the risk culture apparent in the trust. Risk management had been a key focus for the trust and it was evident this work was gathering pace.
- The trust had responded positively to previous inspection findings in 2019. For example, we saw improvements in the way the specialist community mental health services for children and young people age monitored patients on the internal waiting lists to keep them safe and respond to changing risks. This service had been rated inadequate in our previous inspection.
- The trust leadership team had actively engaged with staff following negative staff survey results. The chair had commenced a culture review when new in post and recognised the need for this work with staff. The review had given staff the chance to share their views with the leadership team and make suggestions about improvements they would like to see being made. The leadership in the organisation had developed a plan to address the views and concerns of staff following the findings of the review in the form of a ‘You said, We did’ action plan.
- The trust had introduced a Patient Leader programme. The programme had recruited and trained a number of patient volunteer leaders to ensure the patient and public voice was well represented in all aspects of service design and delivery. Patient leaders supported and co-produced quality improvement projects, review of services and participated in staff recruitment.
- The board were committed to quality and inclusion. There was an active focus on equality, diversity and inclusion represented at board level. There were several staff networks who met regularly.
How we carried out the inspection
We used CQC’s interim methodology for monitoring services during the COVID-19 pandemic including on site and remote interviews by phone or online.
We visited six of the trust’s community-based mental health teams for adults of working age, we visited the West, Central and North East locality teams for the specialist community mental health services for children and young people, we visited the child and adolescent mental health ward and four acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU).
During the community--based mental health teams inspection, the inspection team:
- visited six ICMHTs (integrated community mental health team) over three days visiting the Team bases and speaking with multidisciplinary team members within each of the teams
- spoke to all managers leading each of the teams
- spoke to the overall teams community matron for service
- interviewed six nurses
- reviewed the quality of the environments
- conducted three staff focus groups with 17 staff members including, employment coordinators, clinical lead occupational therapy, occupational therapy student, nurses, administrative staff, social workers, preceptorship mental health nurse and clinical psychologists
- reviewed six clinic rooms
- spoke to six patients
- reviewed 34 care and treatment records including risk assessments.
- reviewed two team meeting minutes
- attended two multidisciplinary team meetings
- looked at a range of policies and procedures.
During the specialist community mental health services for children and young people inspection, the inspection team:
- visited the West, Central and North East locality teams. We also interviewed staff from the eating disorder service, the learning disability team, the intensive support team and the access team
- interviewed the manager for each team and the overall service managers
- reviewed 18 care records
- spoke with three young people and seven parents or carers
- spoke with 26 staff from all the teams
- reviewed a number of policies, meeting minutes and assessments related to the running of the services
- observed two therapy sessions
- observed several staff members in two multidisciplinary team meetings
During the child and adolescent mental health ward inspection, the inspection team:
- visited the site and looked at the quality of the ward environments and observed how staff were caring for young people
- spoke with six young people who used the service and six parents and carers
- reviewed five electronic and paper copies of care and treatment records
- spoke with 11 members of staff including a specialist paediatric pharmacist, the operational lead for inpatient CAMHS (child and adolescent mental health services) and urgent care pathway, a speciality doctor, a family therapist and family liaison officer. We also spoke to healthcare assistants and nurses
- reviewed a range of documents relating to the running of the service
- looked at medicines management, including medicines charts and electronic systems.
During the acute wards for adults of working age and psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) inspection, the inspection team:
- visited four inpatient wards: Carbis and Perran ward at Longreach House and Fletcher and Harvest ward at Bodmin Hospital. We were unable to enter Cove ward due to an outbreak of COVID-19 on the ward
- spoke with 17 members of nursing staff including registered nurses, health care assistants, agency nursing staff and student nurses
- spoke with seven multidisciplinary team members including occupational therapists, social inclusion officers, pharmacists, and a clinical psychologist
- spoke with leaders of services, including modern matrons, clinical and quality leads, ward managers, a nurse consultant and members of the estates team
- completed a focus groups with mental health advocates that visited the ward
- spoke to members of the estates team
- interviewed 16 patients and five relatives of patients
- reviewed 18 patients’ care and treatment records
- carried out a specific check relating to medication management on the wards and reviewed medicines administration records for 19 patients
- looked at a range of policies, procedures and other documents relating to the running of each service.
You can find further information about how we carry out our inspections on our website: www.cqc.org.uk/what-we-do/how-we-do-our-job/what-we-do-inspection.