- Ambulance service
Trust Headquarters Also known as NHS 111 Service
All Inspections
12 April 2022
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection of the NHS 111 at the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) Trust Headquarters on 12 April 2022. The inspection formed part of a review of urgent and emergency care within the wider healthcare system.
We had an additional focus on the urgent and emergency care pathway and carried out several inspections of other services across a few weeks. This was to assess how patient risks were being managed across health and social care services during increased and extreme capacity pressures.
As this was a focused inspection, and we did not look at every key line of enquiry, we did not re-rate the service this time. At our previous inspection in May 2016 we rated The Trust Headquarters as good overall.
A summary of CQC findings on urgent and emergency care services in Lancashire and South Cumbria.
Urgent and emergency care services across England have been and continue to be under sustained pressure. In response, CQC is undertaking a series of coordinated inspections, monitoring calls and analysis of data to identify how services in a local area work together to ensure patients receive safe, effective and timely care. We have summarised our findings for Lancashire and South Cumbria below:
Lancashire and South Cumbria.
Provision of urgent and emergency care in Lancashire and South Cumbria was supported by services, stakeholders, commissioners and the local authority.
We spoke with staff in services across primary care, integrated urgent care, acute, mental health, ambulance services and adult social care. Staff felt tired and continued to work under sustained pressure across health and social care.
We found demand on urgent care services had increased. Whilst feedback on these services was mostly positive, we found patients were accessing these services instead of seeing their GP. Local stakeholders were aware that people were opting to attend urgent care services and were engaging with local communities to explore the reasons for this.
The NHS 111 service which covered the all of the North West area, including Lancashire and South Cumbria, were experiencing significant staffing challenges across the whole area. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the service had recruited people from the travel industry. As these staff members returned to their previous roles, turnover was high and recruitment was particularly challenging. Service leaders worked well with system partners to ensure the local Directory of Services was up to date and working effectively to signpost people to appropriate services. However, due to a combination of high demand and staffing issues people experienced significant delays in accessing the 111 service. Following initial assessment, and if further information or clinical advice was required, people would receive a call back by a clinician at the NHS 111 service or from the clinical assessment service, delivered by out-of-hours providers. The NHS 111 service would benefit from a wide range of clinicians to be available such as dental, GP and pharmacists to negate the need for onward referral to other service providers.
People who called 999 for an ambulance experienced significant delays. Ambulance crews also experienced long handover delays at most Emergency Departments. Crews also found it challenging managing different handover arrangements. Some emergency departments in Lancashire and South Cumbria struggled to manage ambulance handover delays effectively which significantly impacted on the ambulance service’s ability to manage the risk in the community. The ambulance service proactively managed escalation processes which focused on a system wide response when services were under additional pressure.
We saw significant delays for people accessing care and treatment in emergency departments. Delays in triage and initial treatment put people at risk of harm. We visited mental health services delivered from the Emergency Department and found these to be well run and meeting people’s needs. However, patients experienced delays in the Emergency Department as accessing mental health inpatient services remained a significant challenge. This often resulted in people being cared for in out of area placements.
We found discharge wasn’t always planned from the point of admission which exacerbated in the poor patient flow seen across services. Discharge was also impacted on by capacity in social care services and the ability to meet people’s needs in the community. We also found some patients were admitted from the Emergency Department because they couldn’t get discharged back into their own home at night.
Increased communication is needed between leaders in both health and social care, particularly during times of escalation when Local Authorities were not always engaged in action plans.
A summary of CQC findings on urgent and emergency care services in Cheshire and Merseyside (Liverpool, Knowsley and South Sefton).
We have summarised our findings for Liverpool, Knowsley and South Sefton within the Cheshire and Merseyside ICS below:
Cheshire and Merseyside (Liverpool, Knowsley and South Sefton)
Provision of urgent and emergency care in Cheshire and Merseyside was supported by services, stakeholders, commissioners and the local authority.
We spoke with staff in services across primary care, integrated urgent care, acute, mental health, ambulance services and adult social care. Staff had continued to work hard under sustained pressure across health and social care services. Services had put systems in place to support staff with their wellbeing, recognising the pressure they continued to work under, in particular for front line ambulance crews and 111 call handlers.
Staff and patients across primary care reported a preference for face to face appointments. Some people reported difficulties when trying to see their GP and preferred not to have telephone appointments. They told us that due to difficulties in making appointments, particularly face to face, they preferred to access urgent care services or go to their nearest Emergency Department. However, appointment availability in Cheshire and Merseyside was in line with national averages. We identified capacity in extended hours GP services which wasn’t being utilised and could be used to reduce the pressure on other services. People and staff also told us of a significant shortage of dental provision, especially for urgent treatment, which resulted in people attending Emergency Departments.
Urgent care services, including walk-in centres were very busy and services struggled to assess people in a timely way. Some people using these services told us they accessed these services as they couldn’t get a same day, face to face GP appointment. We found some services went into escalation. Whilst system partners met with providers to understand service pressures, we did not always see appropriate action taken to alleviate pressure on services already over capacity.
The NHS 111 service, which covered all of the North West area including Cheshire and Merseyside, were experiencing significant staffing challenges across the whole area. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the service had recruited people from the travel industry. As these staff members returned to their previous roles, turnover was high, and recruitment was particularly challenging. Service leaders worked well with system partners to ensure the local Directory of Services was up to date and working effectively to signpost people to appropriate services. However, due to a combination of high demand and staffing issues people experienced significant delays in accessing the 111 service. Following initial assessment and if further information or clinical advice was required, people would receive a call back by a clinician at the NHS 111 service or from the clinical assessment service, delivered by out-of-hours (OOH) provider.
We found some telephone consultation processes were duplicated and could be streamlined. At peak times, people were waiting 24-48 hours for a call back from the clinical assessment and out of hours services. We identified an opportunity to increase the skill mix in clinicians for both the NHS 111 and the clinical assessment service. For example, pharmacists could support people who need advice on medicines. Following our inspections, out of hours and NHS 111 providers have actively engaged and worked collaboratively to find ways of improving people’s experience by providing enhanced triage and signposting.
People who called 999 for an ambulance experienced significant delays. Whilst ambulance crews experienced some long handover delays at the Emergency Departments we inspected, data indicated these departments were performing better than the England average for handovers, although significantly below the national targets. However, crews found it challenging managing different handover arrangements at different hospitals and reported long delays.
Service leaders were working with system partners to identify ways of improving performance and to ensure people could access appropriate care in a timely way. For example, the service worked with mental health services to signpost people directly to receive the right care, as quickly as possible. The ambulance service proactively managed escalation processes which focused on a system wide response when services were under additional pressure.
We saw significant levels of demand on emergency departments which, exacerbated by staffing issues, resulted in long delays for patients. People attending these departments reported being signposted by other services, a lack of confidence in GP telephone appointments and a shortage of dental appointments. We inspected some mental health services in Emergency Departments which worked well with system partners to meet people’s needs.
We found there was poor patient flow across acute services into community and social care services. Discharge planning should be improved to ensure people are discharged in a timely way. Staff working in care homes (services inspected were located in Liverpool and South Sefton) reported poor communication about discharge arrangements which impacted on their ability to meet people’s needs.
The provision of primary care to social care, including GP and dental services, should be improved to support people to stay in their own homes. Training was being rolled out to support care home staff in managing deteriorating patients to avoid the need to access emergency services. We found some examples of effective community nursing services, but these were not consistently embedded across social care. Staffing across social care services remains a significant challenge and we found a high use of agency staff. For example, in one nursing home, concerns about staff competencies and training impacted on the service’s ability to accept and provide care for people who had increased needs.
We found some care homes felt pressure to admit people from hospital. Ongoing engagement between healthcare leaders and Local Authorities would be beneficial to improve transfers of care between hospitals and social care services. In addition, increased collaborative working is needed between service leaders. We found senior leaders from different services sometimes only communicated during times of escalation.
This report covers the inspection of the Trust Headquarters NHS 111 service. The reports of previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Trust Headquarters on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This report comprises information from a combination of:
- What we found when we inspected the provider
- Information from our ongoing monitoring of data about the provider and information from the provider, patients, staff, the public and other organisations.
At this inspection we found:
- The service had good systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When they did happen, the service learned from them and improved their processes.
- The service routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
- Staff involved and treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
- Patients were able to access care and treatment from the service within an appropriate timescale for their needs.
- There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Continue to proactively monitor call demand to ensure staffing levels are appropriate.
- Continue to review call audit data to meet the required national targets.
- Continue with plan of safeguarding training for all clinicians.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care
23 May 2016
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We inspected the NHS 111 service which is provided by North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (NWAS) on 23, 24, 25 and 26 May 2016. This inspection was undertaken as part of a joint inspection of the whole Trust with the CQC hospital team.
NWAS is the contract holder for the NHS 111 service in the North West and sub-contracts approximately a 20% share of the service to two GP Out-of-Hours (OOHs) providers, Fylde Coast Medical Services (FCMS) and Urgent Care 24 (UC24). Both FCMS and UC24 are registered with the CQC as GP OOHs providers. Blackpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is the lead commissioner for the NHS 111 service in the North West and holds the contract for the full service with NWAS.
We carried out this announced inspection of NWAS NHS 111 as part of our comprehensive approach to inspecting NHS 111 services. We did not undertake inspections of FCMS and UC24 NHS 111. However as part of the NWAS NHS 111 inspection we visited the two subcontractors call centres in the evening at peak activity times.
Overall NWAS NHS 111 is rated as good.
Our key findings were as follows:
- NWAS worked closely with the lead CCG who commissioned the NWAS NHS 111 service on behalf of all 33 CCGs in the North West.
- NWAS NHS 111 provided a safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led service to a diverse population spread across the whole of the North West of England.
- Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses.
- All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were discussed to support improvement. Information about safety was valued and used to promote learning and improvement.
- Risk management was embedded and recognised as the responsibility of all staff.
- Staff took action to safeguard patients and they were aware of the process to make safeguarding referrals. Safeguarding systems and processes were in place to safeguard both children and adults at risk of harm or abuse, including calls from children and frequent callers to the service.
- Staff had been trained to ensure they used the NHS Pathways system safely and effectively. (NHS Pathways is a Department of Health approved computer based operating system that provides a suite of clinical assessments for triaging telephone calls from patients based on the symptoms they report when they call). Once trained there were comprehensive systems in place to monitor staff usage of NHS Pathways including call auditing. An effective action plan was in place to ensure all call audits were undertaken in accordance with NHS Pathways licence.
- The service was monitored against National Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Due to significant staff attrition in late December 2015 NWAS NHS111 struggled to meet the service KPIs. Effective action was implemented to improve their performance in achieving the key performance indicators and this included the recruitment and training of staff. The service met regularly with the commissioner of the service who was kept up to date about performance.
- Patients using the service were supported effectively during the telephone triage process. Consent to triage was sought and their decisions were respected. We saw that staff treated patients with compassion, and responded appropriately to their feedback.
- The service responded effectively to complaints and to patient and staff feedback.
- The leadership within the NHS 111 service was accessible and visible. There was a culture of support, continuous improvement and development of the service.
- All staff spoken with at all four call centre locations were enthusiastic and committed to providing a safe quality service. Staff said they felt supported directly with on the job supervision and support and indirectly with access to online training and guidance.
The areas where NWAS NHS 111 should make improvement are:
- Continue with the implementation of the staff recruitment and training plan to ensure the service is staffed to full capacity.
- Continue with the implementation of the call auditing improvement plan.
- Continue to implement the planned programme to complete staff annual appraisal.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
24 March 2015
During a routine inspection
NHS 111 is a telephone-based service where patients are assessed, given advice and directed to a local service that most appropriately meets their needs. For example, this could be an out-of-hours GP service, walk-in centre or urgent care centre, community nurse, emergency dentist, emergency department, emergency ambulance or late opening chemist.
We inspected the NHS 111 service, located at Middlebrook in Bolton, which was provided by North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (NWAS) on 24 March 2015. We carried out this announced inspection as part of the development of our approach to inspecting NHS 111 services. Therefore we have not rated the service.
NWAS was inspected in August and September 2014 under the Care Quality Commission’s revised inspection approach. At that inspection the core services: Access to Service, Emergency and Urgent Care and Patient Transport Services were inspected. The focus of this inspection was the NHS 111 service therefore we did not review any of the areas identified for development and improvement at the inspection in August 2014
Our key findings were as follows:
NWAS NHS 111 provided a well-led, safe, effective, responsive and caring service to a diverse population spread across the North West England.
- The NHS 111 had systems in place to mitigate safety risks. Incidents and significant events were identified, investigated and reported.
- The service was monitored against the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for NHS 111 services and adapted National Quality Requirements (NQRs). These data collection tools provided intelligence to the provider and commissioners about the level of service being provided. Action plans were implemented where variation in performance was identified.
- NWAS NHS 111 worked closely with the 33 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) in the North West, who commissioned the service.
- Staff were trained and monitored to ensure they used the NHS Pathways safely and effectively. (NHS Pathways is a licenced computer based operating system that provides a suite of clinical assessments for triaging telephone calls from patients based on the symptoms they report when they call).
- Staff were supported to report issues and concerns.
- Patients using the service were encouraged and supported to respond to the telephone clinical triage and their consent and decisions respected.
- The service was responsive and acted on patient complaints and feedback.
- There was visible leadership, with an emphasis on continuous improvement and development of the service.
- The vision to develop and expand the service in accordance with the five-year business plan was being implemented.
There were areas where the provider should make improvements:
- Ensure periodic analysis of complaints, customer feedback and significant events is carried out to identify themes and trends so that appropriate action can be taken if required.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
10 February 2014
During a routine inspection
The inspection took place over four days in the week commencing 10th February2014. We visited four ambulance stations (St Helens, Whiston, Chester and Warrington), and observed ambulance crews arriving at Whiston and Warrington Accident and Emergency departments.
We were able to observe staff at work in one of the Emergency Operations Centres (EOC) at Anfield in Liverpool to see how emergency calls were dealt with, and how ambulances were dispatched.
We spoke with people who had recently used the service who commented: 'I was well looked after and I felt safe'; 'They kept my relative dignified'; 'They were good and knew what they were doing'; 'They were perfect'; 'They came quite quickly, I'm not sure, but it wasn't a long wait' and 'They do a marvellous job'.
We also spoke with staff who stated: 'Cannot fault availability of equipment ' never lacking resources'; 'Clinical supervision is good and has improved recently'; 'There is a good management team in my sector'; 'Yes, definitely [feel supported] ' my senior paramedic is fantastic'; 'I see dedicated staff who do an excellent job' and 'The service is gathering speed, improving and going in a positive direction'.
Care and treatment was planned and delivered in ways that promoted people's safety and welfare. Staff followed agreed assessment and care pathways, helping to ensure appropriate treatment was delivered.
People received safe and coordinated care, treatment and support where more than one provider was involved, or they moved between services.
People who used the service and staff who worked for NWAS were not at risk of harm from unsafe or unsuitable equipment.
Staff received ongoing managerial support, had good access to clinical supervision and had opportunities to update their knowledge and improve their skills.
There were systems in place to assess, monitor and improve performance. Learning from incidents, complaints and investigations took place with appropriate changes being implemented.
25, 26, 27 February and 1 March 2013
During a routine inspection
We visited an emergency control centre, made unannounced visits to eight ambulance stations and spent time at three hospital Accident and Emergency departments. We carried out telephone interviews with patients and spoke with patients in A and E departments.
Care and treatment was planned and delivered in ways that promoted people's safety and welfare. Staff followed agreed assessment and care pathways, helping to ensure appropriate treatment was delivered. Patients told us; 'They didn't make me feel stupid for panicking'. 'The paramedics were excellent'. And 'They were great and explained everything'.
Medicines were handled safely, securely and appropriately. Staff were aware of the correct procedures and followed these in practice. Regular checks, audits and reporting systems helped to promote the safety of patients.
Staff received ongoing managerial support, had good access to clinical supervision and had opportunities to update their knowledge and improve their skills.
There were systems in place to assess, monitor and improve performance. Learning from incidents, complaints and investigations took place with appropriate changes being implemented.
15 March 2012
During a routine inspection
We were able to observe staff at work in one of the contact centres (999 call centre) at Broughton in Preston to see how 999 calls were dealt with, and how ambulances were dispatched.
As part of the review we asked NWAS to contact people who had recently used the service to get their agreement to speak to us on the telephone so we could ask them about their experience of the care they had received. We carried out six telephone interviews and also used the most recent patient survey information from NWAS.
Where possible we have drawn on evidence collected and seen, in relation to how NWAS manages emergency services, but as the organisation deals with more than just 999 ambulances and urgent care across three distinct areas in the North West our report does include evidence that captures how the wider organisation is managed.
Service users were very happy with the service provided and told us:
'I was very satisfied with the service.'
'The ambulance arrived within 5 minutes, there were no problems. They were very, very good.'
'I can't fault them.'
'The ambulance staff were friendly, professional, caring and fantastic in every way.'
'The ambulance crew told me everything that was going on.'
'The ambulance staff listened to me and did everything they could to help me and comfort me.'
NWAS staff told us:
"I am really proud of where this organisation has got to and where it's going.'
'Training is good we are equipped to do the job we do, every year there is clinical refresher training.'
'Performance is good we develop staff and encourage training. There is good communication between staff and managers and good teamwork at both operational and clinical level.'
A number of ambulance staff told us 'I absolutely love my job."