• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

University Hospital Aintree

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Longmoor Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7AL (0151) 525 5980

Provided and run by:
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Report from 15 November 2024 assessment

On this page

Responsive

Requires improvement

Updated 17 July 2024

Care, treatment and support were accessible, and in line with best practice, quality standards and legal requirements, including those on equality and human rights. The service used people’s feedback and other evidence to actively seek to improve access for people more likely to experience barriers or delays in accessing their care.

This service scored 54 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Person-centred Care

Score: 2

We did not look at Person-centred Care during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Care provision, Integration and continuity

Score: 2

We did not look at Care provision, Integration and continuity during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Providing Information

Score: 2

We did not look at Providing Information during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Listening to and involving people

Score: 2

We did not look at Listening to and involving people during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Equity in access

Score: 3

Care, treatment and support were accessible, and in line with best practice, quality standards and legal requirements, including those on equality and human rights. The service made reasonable adjustments for disabled people, addressing communication barriers and having accessible premises.

Leaders and staff prioritised and allocated resources and opportunities as needed to tackle inequalities and achieve equity of access.

The service used people’s feedback and other evidence to actively seek to improve access for people more likely to experience barriers or delays in accessing their care. Although care, treatment and support was accessible, it was not always timely.

Equity in experiences and outcomes

Score: 2

We did not look at Equity in experiences and outcomes during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Planning for the future

Score: 2

We did not look at Planning for the future during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.