• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: The Wilf Ward Family Trust Domiciliary Care Harrogate and Northallerton

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 7 Phoenix Business Centre, Low Mill Road, Ripon, North Yorkshire, HG4 1NS (01765) 602678

Provided and run by:
The Wilf Ward Family Trust

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

2 and 7 December 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 2 and 7 December 2015 and was announced. The last inspection took place in December 2013 when the service was found to be meeting the Regulations.

The Wilf Ward Family Trust Domiciliary Care Harrogate and Northallerton provides personal care and support to people who have a learning disability. People who receive support live in small supported living services which are staffed according to assessed needs. The organisation currently has 14 supported living homes in the area, although not all the people require support with personal care. The aim of the service is to support people to live independently.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe at the service. Staff were confident about how to protect people from harm and what they would do if they had any safeguarding concerns. There were good systems in place to make sure that people were supported to take medicines safely and as prescribed.

Risks to people had been assessed and plans put in place to keep risks to a minimum. The provider had effective systems to monitor and learn from any accidents or incidents.

There were enough staff on duty to make sure people’s needs were met. The provider had robust recruitment procedures to make sure staff had the required skills and were of suitable character and background.

The majority of the staff told us they enjoyed working at the service and that there was good team work. Staff were supported through training, regular supervisions and team meetings to help them carry out their roles effectively. Staff were supported by an open and accessible management team.

The manager and staff were aware of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). DoLS are put in place to protect people where their freedom of movement is restricted. The registered manager had taken appropriate action for those people for whom restricted movement was a concern. Best interest meetings were held where people had limited capacity to make decisions for themselves. People were supported to make decisions and choices for themselves, wherever possible.

People told us that staff were caring and that their privacy and dignity were respected. Care plans were person centred and showed that individual preferences were taken into account. Care plans gave clear directions to staff about the support people required to have their needs met. People were supported to maintain their health and had access to health services if needed.

People’s needs were regularly reviewed and appropriate changes were made to the support people received. People were encouraged to be involved in their support plans and had opportunities to make comments about the service and how it could be improved.

There were effective management arrangements in place. The registered manager had a good oversight of the service and was aware of areas of practice that needed to be improved. There were systems in place to look at the quality of the service provided and action was taken where shortfalls were identified. The provider made sure that the beliefs and values of the organisation were promoted throughout the service.

6 February 2014

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we spent time with staff and the manager of the service. We also looked at records relating to the support provided.

We carried out this inspection because we had received information of concern about the use of agency staff, the quality of risk assessments and care plans.

We found that people had a care plan that was individual to them and outlined the support they needed. We saw that people were enabled to access the local community and develop their independence skills with the support provided. Each person had appropriate risk assessments and staff understood these documents and the importance of them being adhered to.

The provider was using agency staff but we saw they were taking action to try and recruit for the vacancies they had. Where they had to use agency staff they had developed a protocol that agency staff had to follow prior to starting their work. This involved arriving at the house one hour before the start of their shift so they had time to read pertinent information about the people they would be supporting. Where agency staff were used they always worked alongside a more experienced member of staff.