• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Hey Baby 4D Watford

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 4, 1a Leavesden Road, Watford, WD24 5EB

Provided and run by:
Ultrasound Image Studio Ltd

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Hey Baby 4D Watford on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Hey Baby 4D Watford, you can give feedback on this service.

28 February 2022

During a routine inspection

We have not previously rated the service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for women and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect women from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to women, acted on them and kept good care records.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of women, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated women with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to women, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of women's individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait for their results.
  • The service considered the impact a potential failed pregnancy or anomaly finding could have on women and their family. They planned services to reduce distress and developed scanning room exit policies to avoid additional distress.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of women receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with women to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

  • The service did not have access to interpreters or signers.
  • The service did not have regular formal staff meetings with minuted outcomes..