• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Global Care Ltd

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

9 Mackenzie Street, Slough, SL1 1XQ (01753) 376171

Provided and run by:
Global Care Ltd

All Inspections

20 September 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Global Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own home and supported living services. The service was not specifically for people with a learning disability and/or autistic people, however at the time of our inspection the only person using the service had these needs. The service had not commenced providing personal care to people in supported living settings.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Systems to protect people from abuse were not implemented. Staff were not trained on how to recognise and report abuse and staff recruitment checks were not carried out prior to supporting people.

Staff skills were not matched to people’s needs and mandatory and specialist initial and refresher training was not arranged by the provider. Staff were not trained to administer emergency medicines which put the person at increased risk of harm. Systems were not in place to protect people from the risk of infection. For example, staff did not use personal protective equipment (PPE) effectively and safely.

Initial assessments to identify people’s needs and risks were not completed prior to care commencing. Care plans were not in place to provide staff with guidance about how to support people according to their needs and preferences.

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

Senior staff did not understand or demonstrate compliance with regulatory and legislative requirements. The management of people’s records did not ensure they were protected and stored safely. The service did not complete audits or checks to monitor the quality and safety of care provided.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability and or who are autistic.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice. Care plans were incomplete and did not contain enough information about how to support people.

Right Care:

People were not always supported with care that was person centred and promoted people's dignity, privacy and human rights. The service failed to ensure there were enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe.

Right Culture: The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff did not always ensure people using services led confident, inclusive and empowered lives. The service failed to evaluate the quality of support provided to people or ensure risks of a closed culture were minimised.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was inadequate (published 8 March 2021). The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found the provider remained in breach of regulations.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about the governance of the service including not meeting the conditions of registration. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks. We also undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions Safe, Effective and Well-led which contain those requirements.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has remained inadequate. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Global Care Limited on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.

We have identified breaches in relation to person-centred care, safe care and treatment, dignity and respect, consent to care, safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment, notifying the Commission of change and incidents, receiving and acting on complaints, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

We took urgent action to place restrictions on the provider's registration which involved stopping any new admissions to the service. We took action to cancel the provider's registration, so they are no longer registered to provide the regulated activity personal care.

Since the last inspection we recognised that the provider had failed to display their rating. This was a breach of regulation and we issued a fixed penalty notice. The provider accepted a fixed penalty and paid this in full.

Follow up

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service remains in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe and there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.

3 November 2021

During a routine inspection

About the service

Global Care Ltd is registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service provided care and support to one person.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were not always treated in a caring and compassionate way. This was because they were not always treated with dignity and respect and their independence was not always promoted. A relative described care staff as, “Caring but not consistent.”

People were not protected from abuse because management were not aware of their individual responsibilities to prevent, identify and report abuse. Arrangements in place to assess and manage risks were not robust enough to keep people safe from harm. Work practices relating to recruitment of staff and administration of medicines did not ensure people’s safety. People were not kept safe from the risk of infection as the provider failed to follow their policy and government guidance in relation to COVID-19. Staff did not understand their responsibilities to report safety incidents internally and the provider’s internal audit processes was not able to identify when things went wrong.

Peoples’ care and support needs were not regularly reviewed to ensure they were met and care plans were still relevant. People received care from staff who were not appropriately trained and supported to fulfil the requirements of their role. The provider did not make sure they obtained consent lawfully and the staff member who obtained consent had the necessary knowledge and understanding of the care and support they were asking consent for. People were not effectively supported at mealtimes, we have made a recommendation about this. The provider did not always work effectively with other agencies to ensure people were effectively cared for and supported. We have made a recommendation about this.

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; as the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice. We found the service failed to act in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People’s care was not always personalised and responsive. We have made a recommendation about this. The provider did not have effective systems to make sure all complaints were investigated without delay.

Managers and staff were not clear about their roles, and understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirements. The provider did not ensure quality assurance systems and processes used to assess and monitor the service were effective. The provider failed to notify us of an incident as they are legally required to do and did not promote a culture that encouraged candour and openness. We have made a recommendation about the Duty of Candour. The provider did not use feedback received to improve the quality and delivery of care. The provider did not have a systematic approach to working with other organisations to improve care outcomes.

We found multiple breaches of Regulations of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

Rating at last inspection and update

This service was registered with us on 2 July 2019 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about the delivery care in relation to manual handling, administration of medicines and nutrition. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see all the sections of this full report.

Enforcement

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to discharge our regulatory enforcement functions required to keep people safe and to hold providers to account where it is necessary for us to do so.

We have identified multiple breaches in relation to person-centred care, safe care and treatment, dignity and respect, how consent was obtained, safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment, notifying the Commission of change and incidents, receiving and acting on complaints, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed.

Follow up

We will request an action plan for the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe. And there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk