Background to this inspection
Updated
19 February 2020
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by an inspector and an Expert by Experience.
An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. The service also provides care and support to people living in a number of supported living settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service a short period of notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection and wanted to be sure there would be people at home to speak with us.
Inspection activity started on 17 January 2020 and ended on 4 February 2020. We visited the office location on 21 January 2020 and 4 February 2020.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service and sought feedback from the local authority. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
During the inspection
We spoke with eight people who used the service, a friend and seven relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with twelve members of staff, including the registered manager, service managers, homes managers and support staff.
We reviewed a range of records. This included four people’s care records, multiple medication records and three staff files. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.
Updated
19 February 2020
About the service
Choice Support (Crewe) is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes including a number of supported living accommodations in the local area. At the time if the inspection of the 88 people who used the service, 48 were receiving personal care.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People told us they felt safe. Staff received training and were knowledgeable about the procedures to follow to protect people from abuse. Training was also provided to people using the service about how to keep themselves safe. Accidents and incidents were recorded with managerial oversight to identify any patterns so that measures could be implemented to prevent recurrence. Safe procedures were followed to ensure that only suitable staff were employed. People were supported to take their medicines by trained and competent staff.
People’s needs were fully and holistically assessed before they received a service. Support was individualised and effective. People were happy with the care they received and felt well supported. Staff received a wide range of training relevant to their role. The service worked with other agencies to support people to maintain their health and wellbeing.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People’s support focused them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.
Warm and friendly relationships had been developed between people using the service and staff and people were clearly comfortable in staff’s company. People were treated without discrimination and with respect. People’s privacy was respected.
Support planning was individualised, person-centred with a clear view of goals and outcomes. People led full and active lives, developed personal relationships, wider friendships and were supported to follow their interests. People’s communication needs were assessed and incorporated into support plans. There was a policy and procedure to handle and respond to complaints which was available in easy read format.
The service was well-led. There was a warm and positive culture. People, relatives and staff told us that management were approachable. The registered manager and staff spoke positively about the provider. People’s views were sought in a variety of ways including informally, during regular meetings and in quality surveys.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection and update: This service was registered with us on 28 January 2019 and this is the first inspection.
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection.