• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Peter Street Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Peter Street, Dover, Kent, CT16 1EF (01304) 216890

Provided and run by:
Peter Street Surgery

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 22 September 2016

Peter Street Surgery is situated in Dover, Kent and has a registered patient population of approximately 7,300. There are one third more patients registered over the age of 75 than the national average. Deprivation, including income deprivation, is slightly higher than the national average.

The practice staff consists of three GP partners (two male and one female), two female practice nurses, two female healthcare assistants, one practice manager as well as administration and reception staff. There is a reception and a waiting area on the ground floor. All patient areas are accessible to patients with mobility issues as well as parents with children and babies.

The practice is not a teaching or training practice (teaching practices take medical students and training practices have GP trainees and Foundation Year Two junior doctors).

The practice has a general medical services (GMS) contract with NHS England for delivering primary care services to local communities.

Primary medical services are provided Monday to Friday between the hours of 8am to 6.30pm. Extended hours surgeries are offered twice each week 6.30pm to 7.30pm. Primary medical services are available to patients registered at Peter Street Surgery via an appointments system. There are a range of clinics for all age groups as well as the availability of specialist nursing treatment and support. There are arrangements with other providers (Integrated Care 24) to deliver services to patients outside of Peter Street Surgery’s working hours.

Services are provided from Peter Street, Dover, Kent, CT16 1EF only.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 22 September 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Peter Street Surgery on 17 June 2015. Breaches of the legal requirements were found. Following the comprehensive inspection, the practice wrote to us to tell us what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches.

We undertook this focussed inspection on 21 July 2016, to check that the practice had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Peter Street Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions. Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority. Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed. All these patients had a named GP and most had had a structured annual review to check that their health and medication needs were being met. There were some exceptions to the regular health checks for long term conditions. The practice was aware of this and had taken action to improve. For those people with the most complex needs, the named GP worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people. There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk, for example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. Immunisation rates were excellent, in every area outperforming the locally achieved results, often significantly so. Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies. The practice recognised that there was shortage of family planning support locally. One of the partners had recently started a weekly family planning clinic, this was also open to patients from other local practices. There was a designated member of staff to ensure that six to eight week baby checks were arranged, conducted and monitored correctly.

Older people

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people. Nationally reported data showed that outcomes for patients were good for conditions commonly found in older people with the exception of some regular health checks. The practice was aware of this and had taken action to improve. The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population and had a range of enhanced services, for example, in dementia and end of life care. It was responsive to the needs of older people, and offered home visits and rapid access appointments for those with enhanced needs.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of working-age people (including those recently retired and students). The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible, flexible and offered continuity of care. The practice was proactive in offering online services as well as a full range of health promotion and screening that reflects the needs for this age group.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). Approximately 87% of people experiencing poor mental health had received an annual physical health check. The practice regularly worked with multidisciplinary teams in the case management of people experiencing poor mental health, including those with dementia. It was working with the local clinical commissioning group to develop improved services for patients with dementia.

The practice had told patients experiencing poor mental health about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations. It had a system in place to follow up patients who had attended accident and emergency (A&E) where they may have been experiencing poor mental health. Most staff had received training on how to care for people with mental health needs and dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 24 September 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. The practice held a register of patients living in vulnerable circumstances including homeless people, travellers and those with a learning disability. It had carried out annual health checks for people with a learning disability and 95% of these patients had received a follow-up. It offered longer appointments for people with a learning disability.

The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of vulnerable people. It had told vulnerable patients about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations. Staff knew how to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies in normal working hours and out of hours.