8 and 15 September 2021
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced inspection at Cornerstone Surgery on 8 and 15 September 2021. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.
The ratings for each key question: -
Safe - Requires improvement
Effective – Requires improvement
Caring - Good
Responsive - Good
Well-led – Requires improvement
We carried out an announced inspection of Cornerstone Surgery on 13 February 2020. The practice was rated requires improvement overall and for being safe, responsive and well-led. Effective was rated as inadequate and caring was rated as good. We issued requirement notices in respect of breaches of Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), Regulation 16 (receiving and acting on complaints) and Regulation 17 (good governance) of the Health and Social Care Act (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cornerstone Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
This inspection was a comprehensive review of information which included a site visit to follow up on:
- Breaches of regulations and ‘shoulds’ identified in the previous inspection.
How we carried out the inspection
Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
- Conducting an interview of Patient Participation Group members using video conferencing
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
- Requesting evidence from the provider
- A short site visit
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated the practice Requires improvement overall and for being safe,effective and well-led. Caring and responsive is now rated as good. We found continued breaches of Regulations 12 (safe care and treatment) and 17 (good governance).
We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing Safe services because:
- Improvements were needed to the management of patient medication to ensure patient safety.
- The provider could not provide checks of emergency equipment and medication to ensure it was safe.
We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing effective services because:
- Performance data relating to childhood immunisations and cervical screening continued to be below the minimum target rates and the number of patients excluded from reviews and medical checks for long-term conditions was above the national average.
- Improvements were needed to monitoring patients with possible long-term conditions.
We rated the practice as Requires Improvement for providing well-led services because:
- A system of audit had recently been introduced but this was not embedded.
- Better oversight of training was needed to ensure updates where completed in a timely manner.
- Records relating to the service were not always accessible or held on-site
We found that:
- At this inspection, on 8 and 15 September 2021, we found that some required improvements had been made and identified a few other areas that required improvement.
- The systems to communicate with staff had improved. There were documented staff meetings and a computer system had been introduced to assist with information sharing.
- Referrals and other correspondence were managed in a timely way.
- Improvements had been made to information provided to patients about making a complaint and to how complaints are managed.
- Training identified as being needed at the last inspection had been provided to staff.
- There had been improvements to the management of significant events.
- Performance data relating to the number of patients who had cervical screening and childhood immunisations continued to be low. Patients excluded from health monitoring and reviews continued to be high. At this inspection there was a plan as to how this was being addressed.
- Improvements were also needed to monitoring patients with possible long-term conditions such as chronic kidney disease.
- The systems to audit the clinical care provided were not embedded and reviewed in order to demonstrate the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care provided.
- All records needed for the operation of the service were not available when requested. This included registration checks for GPs, checks of emergency medication and equipment and contractors checks of the fire alarm and emergency lighting.
- The system for ensuring patients had the required monitoring when prescribed certain medicines was not effective. Medication reviews were not being fully documented. Historical safety alerts had not been monitored to ensure safe prescribing.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:
- Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
- Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Record the checks under taken to confirm the registration of clinical staff
- Provide fire marshal training to sufficient staff to enable cover for staff absences.
- Put in place a risk assessment for the security of doors at the practice.
- Put in place guidance for non-clinical staff to refer to regarding sepsis management to support their training.
- Continue to review patients prescribed hypnotic medicines to ensure appropriate prescribing.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care