• Doctor
  • GP practice

OHP-Church Road Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

90 Church Road, Sheldon, Birmingham, West Midlands, B26 3TP 0844 375 6565

Provided and run by:
Our Health Partnership

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about OHP-Church Road Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about OHP-Church Road Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

During an assessment under our new approach

OHP - Church Road Surgery is a NHS GP practice which provides primary care services to patients in the Sheldon area of Birmingham. The practice is rated as Good overall, with all key questions rated as good, apart from Responsive, which is rated as requires improvement. We carried out an announced assessment of one quality statement, equity of access, under the key question Responsive at OHP – Church Road Surgery on the 11 March 2024. We carried out the assessment as part of our work to understand how practices are working to try to meet peoples demands for access and to better understand the experiences of people who use services and providers. We recognise the work that GP practices have been engaged in to continue to provide safe, quality care to the people they serve. We know staff are carrying this out whilst the demand for general practice remains exceptionally high, with more appointments being provided than ever. However, this challenging context, access to general practice remains a concern for people. Our strategy makes a commitment to deliver regulation driven by people’s needs and experiences of care. The assessment of the quality statement equity of access includes looking at what practices are doing innovatively to improve patient access to primary care and sharing this information to drive improvement. We found that the practice had organised services to meet patients’ needs, particularly those who were most likely to have difficulty accessing care. The practice used feedback and other information to monitor and improve access. The practice had taken action to improve access, particularly in increasing capacity but this was not yet reflected consistently in the GP patient survey data or in other sources of patient feedback.

30 January 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of OHP-Church Road Surgery on 30 January 2019 as part of our inspection programme. There is a branch surgery (Tile Cross Surgery) but we did not visit that site on the day.

The practice was previously inspected under the previous provider in March 2017 and was rated Requires Improvement overall, with Requires improvements ratings in Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led and a Good rating in Caring.

During this inspection in January 2019, we based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and requires improvement for responsive and all population groups.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing responsive services because:

  • Patient feedback on the national GP patient survey regarding experience of making an appointment was significantly below local and national averages. The practice was aware and taking steps to address this. As a result of our findings in responsive, all population groups have been rated as requires improvement.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services because:

The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Patient outcomes for those with long term conditions were in line with other practices nationally with low levels of exception reporting.
  • Uptake of national cancer screening programmes were also consistent with other practices nationally and child immunisation uptake exceeded World Health Organisation targets.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Since our previous inspection there had been significant changes in the management of the service which had led to improvements for patients now and with future benefits intended.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to explore and develop ways to improve telephone access and experience of patients when making appointments.
  • Review the storage of cleaning equipment.
  • Review cleaning schedules to ensure they are sufficiently detailed to demonstrate areas being cleaned.
  • Review the safety procedurs in place to prevent the medicines fridge being turned off accidently.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice