This practice is rated remains rated Requires improvement overall. (Previous inspection 08/03/2016 – Requires improvement)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Requires improvement
Are services responsive? – Requires improvement
Are services well-led? - Good
As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:
Older People – Requires improvement
People with long-term conditions – Requires improvement
Families, children and young people – Requires improvement
Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Requires improvement
People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Requires improvement
People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Requires improvement
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Claremont Medical Centre on 8 March 2016 and rated the practice as requires improvement for safe, effective and caring key questions. This led to an overall rating of requires improvement. Breaches of legal requirements were found and requirement notices were issued in relation to fit and proper persons employed (Regulation 19), staffing (Regulation 18) and governance (Regulation 17). The full comprehensive report can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Claremont Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection which we undertook on 16 January 2018 to confirm the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 8 March 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements. The overall rating from this visit was requires improvement.
Overall the practice remains rated as requires improvement.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
-
The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
-
The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
-
Staff understood the relevant consent and decision-making requirements of legislation and guidance, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
-
Systems were in place to protect personal information about patients
-
The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
-
Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
-
Patients rated the practice significantly below local and national averages on how they could access treatment and care.
-
Information about how to make a complaint or raise concerns was available, however the service did not record verbal concerns or complaints.
-
The practice had a vision which now formed part of their business plan. The practice’s vision was to give something back to the community & offer the people of Walthamstow especially the highly deprived ward of Higham Hill a better health care.
The areas where the provider must make improvement is:
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
-
Consider recording the vital signs for patients who attends for acute illnesses.
-
Take steps to improve communication for patients who have difficulty hearing and those visually impaired.
-
Review how information from practice meeting is discussed and cascaded to the practice nursing team.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice