When we visited Lansdowne Surgery on 22 May 2018, to carry out a comprehensive inspection, we found the practice was not compliant with the regulation relating to good governance. The practice was not doing all that was reasonably practicable to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users. Specifically, we found they had not ensured that:
- Systems were in place to record, monitor and manage staff training to ensure completion.
- Actions in relation to fire safety had been completed.
- Management of health waste was in accordance with regulations.
We also said the practice should:
- Continue to take action to establish a patient participation group.
Overall the practice was rated as Good. They were rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring and responsive services, and as requires improvement for providing well-led services. The full report of the May 2018, inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Lansdowne Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This report covers the announced follow up focused inspection we carried out at Lansdowne Surgery on 18 December 2018, to review the actions taken by the practice to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was meeting legal requirements.
At this inspection we found the practice had addressed the regulatory breaches we identified on our last inspection. We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
As a result of this inspection, we have rated Lansdowne Surgery as good for the provision of well-led services. The practice remains rated as good overall, and good for all key questions and population groups.
We found that:
- The practice had reviewed and improved their systems to record, monitor and manage staff training and to ensure mandatory training was completed. However, this system was not yet always working effectively.
- The practice managed health waste in line with regulations.
- All actions in relation to fire safety had been completed.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Continue to take action to establish a patient participation group.
- Continue to develop their system for monitoring staff training and take steps to ensure the system is effective and embedded in the practice.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice