• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Parkview Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Cleckheaton Health Centre, Greenside, Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire, BD19 5AP (01274) 399484

Provided and run by:
Parkview Surgery

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

24 August 2023

During a routine inspection

We previously carried out an announced focused inspection of Parkview Surgery on 16 and 19 December 2022. Following that inspection, the provider was rated inadequate overall (inadequate in safe and well-led, and requires improvement in effective) and placed into special measures. We issued warning notices for breaches of Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) and Regulation 17 (Good governance) on 22 December 2022.

We then carried out an announced focused inspection on 20 and 24 April 2023 to check that the provider had complied with the Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) warning notice. At that inspection we found the provider had made general improvements with the proper and safe management of medicines, which included prescription stationery and patient specific directions (PSDs). However, we found some areas reviewed during our clinical searches required further improvement. For example, medicines reviews, some medicines requiring monitoring, patients prescribed medicines subject to a safety alert, and patients with some long-term conditions. We did not review the previous ratings awarded to the provider at this inspection.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Parkview Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was an announced, comprehensive, rated inspection carried out on 23 and 24 August 2023 to follow-up on all breaches of regulation from the a previous inspection in December 2022.

Overall, the practice is now rated as Good.

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • Reviewing staff questionnaires.
  • A short site visit to the provider.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice had been responsive to the findings of our previous inspections, and we found improvements to systems and processes in all areas of concern found at our previous inspections. In particular, safe recruitment, induction, appraisal and training, incident reporting, clinical workflow, premises and facilities and systems to keep staff informed.
  • We found from our remote clinical searches that the provider had made improvements with the proper and safe management of medicines, which included prescription stationery, patient specific directions, patient safety alerts, medicines reviews, medicines requiring monitoring, and patients with long-term conditions.
  • There were systems in place to safeguard children and vulnerable adults from abuse and staff we spoke with knew how to identify and report safeguarding concerns.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • There was a programme of quality improvement, including clinical audit.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The practice had established a governance and leadership structure to develop high-quality, person-centre care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue with the embedding of systems and processess to ensure the proper and safe management of medicines.
  • Continue to monitor and make improvements to increase the uptake of cervical screening.
  • Improve the identification of carers on the practice register.
  • Continue to monitor patient outcomes for access, in particular accessing the practice by telephone.

I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by the service.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

20 April 2023 and 24 April 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We previously carried out an announced focused inspection of Parkview Surgery on 16 and 19 December 2022. Following that inspection, the provider was rated inadequate overall (inadequate in safe and well-led, and requires improvement in effective) and placed in special measures. We issued warning notices for breaches of Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) and Regulation 17 (Good governance) on 22 December 2022.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Parkview Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 20 and 24 April 2023 to check that the provider had complied with the Regulation 12 (Safe care and treatment) warning notice which required compliance by 17 February 2023. We did not review the Regulation 17 (Good governance) warning notice at this inspection as this has a required compliance date of 12 May 2023.

We did not review the previous ratings awarded to this provider at this inspection.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • A short site visit.
  • Interviews with staff.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice had taken steps to become compliant with Regulation 12 (1) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We saw that the practice had reviewed their protocols to support the proper and safe management of medicines.
  • We found from our remote clinical searches that the provider had made general improvements with the proper and safe management of medicines, which included prescription stationery and patient specific directions. However, we found some areas reviewed during our clinical searches required further improvement. For example, medicines reviews, some medicines requiring monitoring, patients prescribed medicines subject to a safety alert, and patients with some long-term conditions.

We found a breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue with the embedding of medicines protocols to ensure the proper and safe management of medicines.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

16 and 19 December 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at Parkview Surgery on 16 and 19 December 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as inadequate.

After the inspection, on 22 December 2022, we issued enforcement warning notices for Regulation 12 – Safe care and treatment and Regulation 17 – Good governance. The practice has been given a timeframe to comply with the warning notices. Further details can be found at the end of this report under enforcement actions.

Safe - Inadequate

Effective – Requires Improvement

Caring – Not Inspected

Responsive – Not Inspected

Well-led - Inadequate

Why we carried out this inspection

This announced focused inspection was carried out as a result of some information of concern we received in relation to systems and processes to ensure safe and effective care and treatment.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A shorter site visit.
  • Reviewing staff questionnaires.
  • Staff interviews.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as inadequate overall.

We rated the practice as inadequate for providing safe services because:

  • There were gaps in safeguarding systems and processes.
  • Recruitment checks were not always carried out in accordance with regulations.
  • A record of the vaccination status of all staff was not maintained in line with guidance.
  • The practice had not undertaken any risk assessments of their own practice area, which included health and safety.
  • The practice did not have a system in place to monitor the facilities management undertaken by NHS Property Services on an ongoing basis to satisfy themselves that all areas were compliant.
  • Aspects of medicines management which included the management of patients prescribed some high-risk medicines, medicines reviews and medicines usage were not always effective.
  • Blank prescription forms for use in printers were not recorded and tracked through the practice.
  • There was no consistent system in place to ensure the appropriate authorisations to administer medicines by the healthcare assistant under a Patient Specific Direction.
  • Systems and processes to report, share, investigate, record, respond and learn from incidents, critical incidents/near misses were not always consistent and effective.
  • Systems for managing and acting on patient safety alerts were not always effective.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing effective services because:

  • The management of patients with some long-term conditions was not always in line with guidance.
  • The practice was unable to demonstrate that all staff, including locum staff, had received the appropriate training, supervision and appraisal.
  • The practice was unable to demonstrate an effective induction system for all staff, including locum staff.

We rated the practice as inadequate for providing well-led services because:

  • There was a lack of systems and processes established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements to demonstrate good governance which included the management of incidents and patient safety alerts.
  • There was no structured and effective system to communicate and document safety and quality outcomes to keep all staff, including locum staff, informed.
  • Systems and processes to manage clinical correspondence, patient related tasks and referrals were not effective and impacted on accurate, complete and contemporaneous patient records.

We found breaches of regulations. The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure all premises and equipment used by the service provider is fit for use.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.

I am placing this service in special measures. Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within 6 months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within 6 months if they do not improve.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further 6 months, and if there is not enough improvement, we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration. Special measures will give people who use the service the reassurance that the care they get should improve.

The evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

13 October 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Parkview Surgery on 13 October 2016 Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The practice worked closely with other organisations in planning how services were provided to ensure that they met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had strong and visible clinical and managerial leadership and governance arrangements.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The practice was one of a group of 11 practices that submitted proposals to the NHS Estates and Technology Transformation Fund to transform care for 90,000 patients in in North Kirklees. The partners had brought about significant change in the practice which delivered improved services and outcomes for patients.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Carry out a risk assessment to identify a list of medicines that are not suitable to stock at the practice and ensure that this is kept under review.
  • Assure themselves that locum GPs understand and work within the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 including the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice