• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Kington Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Eardisley Road, Kington, Herefordshire, HR5 3EA (01544) 230302

Provided and run by:
Kington Medical Practice

All Inspections

7 February 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Kington Medical Practice on 26 November 2015. The overall rating for the practice was good. The full comprehensive report on the November 2015 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Kington Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 7 February 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 26 November 2015. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice rating remains good and is unchanged following this inspection.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Risks had been assessed and managed. Significant events were recorded and we saw evidence of the learning and action that had taken place as a result. The practice was aware of the requirement to inform CQC of certain events and had done so following an incident involving the dispensary.
  • All required employment checks were completed for non-clinical staff carrying out chaperone duties or for staff who had unsupervised access to patients.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Ensure that relevant historical information about patients is available for clinicians. Patients’ notes had not been summarised prior to 2003.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review the provision of regular clinical meetings to facilitate sharing of information and best practice.
  • Continue to use the results of the national GP patient survey and other patient feedback to inform further improvements in respect of access to the service.
  • Communicate effectively with the practice team the roles and responsibilities of the external healthcare organisation which supports the practice.

In September 2015 the practice had entered into an arrangement with an external healthcare organisation. The intention of this was to stabilise the practice by gaining support with finance, administration, governance and GP recruitment. In November 2015 we found that communication with the practice team regarding the details of these arrangements had been limited.

These areas were highlighted following our inspection in 2015. We found that these areas had not been addressed in our inspection in February 2017.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

26 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Kington Medical Practice on 26 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. However, not all risks were assessed and managed. Some significant events had not been recorded and the practice had no evidence of the learning and action that had taken place as a result.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and generally well managed and the practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity.
  • Not all required employment checks were completed for non-clinical staff carrying out chaperone duties or for staff who had unsupervised access to patients and there was no risk assessment to show how the practice reached these decisions.
  • A programme of clinical audits was underway. One completed audit cycle showed how the practice had used the results to make improvements. The GPs had prioritised direct patient care due to their recruitment problems which reduced the time available for structured clinical meetings.
  • Urgent appointments were available on the day they were requested and unwell children under the age of two were seen as soon as they arrived at the practice. A nurse practitioner ran a walk in service four days a week (increased to five shortly after the inspection) for patients with minor illnesses. The practice established this to help maintain a responsive service to the practice population by increasing the number of appointments.
  • The practice provided a responsive service to large numbers of older patients living in local care homes; many of these patients had complex care and treatment needs which needed frequent GP input. At the time of the inspection the practice also provided a service to a 10 bed intermediate care unit to enable patients to be discharged from hospital in a timely way.
  • National data showed that the practice worked in line with national guidance to provide an effective service for patients experiencing poor mental health and patients living with dementia.
  • The practice responded constructively to support families living in circumstances which might make them vulnerable.
  • Patients spoke highly of the practice team and were complimentary about the care and treatment they received. They said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect but had concerns about the GP recruitment problem and the impact of this on continuity of care and the future of the practice.
  • The practice team were open about the challenges they faced at the practice and had sought solutions to help them maintain the service. In September 2015 they entered into an arrangement with an external healthcare company to gain support with administration, governance and GP recruitment. Two GPs from this organisation planned to become executive partners at the practice.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Improve recruitment arrangements, including written policies and procedures to ensure all necessary employment and ongoing checks are completed for staff.

  • Ensure that all significant events are recorded to show any remedial action taken and to provide for the foundations for shared learning and implementation of improvements. Where necessary the practice must also inform CQC of significant events.

  • Formally review and risk assess security arrangements for the dispensary.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review the provision of regular clinical meetings, training and shared learning opportunities.
  • Continue to use the results of the national GP patient survey and other patient feedback to consider how further improvements could be made in respect of access to the service.
  • Effectively communicate the role and responsibilities of the external healthcare organisation in supporting the practice.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice