23 November 2023
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Spa Surgery on 22 and 23 November 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as good.
Safe - good
Effective - good
Caring - good
Responsive - good
Well-led - good
Following our previous inspection on 1 February 2017, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Spa Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities. This was due to the length of time since the last inspection.
This inspection was a comprehensive inspection, therefore we inspected all of the following key questions:
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led
How we carried out the inspection/review
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews in person and using video conferencing.
- Staff questionnaires circulated prior to the inspection.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- Reviewing feedback from patients via the CQC share your experience forms.
- A short site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care. The majority of feedback we received from patients was positive about the way they were treated by staff at the practice.
- Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
- The practice was responsive to the needs of the local population and tailored services in response to patient needs. For example, the practice offered an in-house Women’s Health Clinic to support patients with symptoms of perimenopause and menopause.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Improve the system for adding alerts to family members of patients on the safeguarding register.
- Improve the process for capturing immunisation of non-clinical staff in line with The Green Book Immunisation Against Infectious Diseases.
- Review and complete actions identified as part of the fire risk assessment on completion of the building works.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care