The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Bishopgate Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

178 Newgate Street, Bishop Auckland, County Durham, DL14 7EJ (01388) 660990

Provided and run by:
Bishopgate Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Bishopgate Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Bishopgate Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

30 April 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Bishopgate Medical Centre on 30 April 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

30 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bishopgate Practice on 30 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

We saw some areas of outstanding practice:

There is a strong visible, person-centred culture. Relationships between people who use the service, those close to them and staff are strong, caring and supportive.

The practice employed their own mental health care worker who triaged all mental health referral. They also had access to three in-house counsellors.

The practice had been accredited with the Young Carers Charter. The practice had signed up to a list of pledges, developed a dedicated policy to help young carers and their families.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice