Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Stag Medical Centre on 25 April 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There was an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events although they had not reviewed actions taken in response to significant events to ensure these were effective.
- Lessons were shared to make sure action was taken to improve safety in the practice although they had not recorded actions taken in response to medical alerts.
- When things went wrong patients received reasonable support, truthful information, and a written apology. They were told about any actions to improve processes to prevent the same thing happening again.
- The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems, processes and practices in place to keep patients safe and safeguarded from abuse. Staff had not received chaperone training where they carried out this role.
- Not all risks to patients were assessed. Areas relating to fire safety and infection prevention and control required improvement.
- Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. However, staff had not received infection control training.
- Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
- Although the practice had made changes to improve the appointment system patients said they did not find it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and they struggled to get through to the practice by telephone. Urgent appointments were available the same day.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
We saw one area of outstanding practice:
The PPG was active in the practice and involved in the development of the practice and services for those in the local community. They had 14 members who met monthly and a virtual group with 60 members. They communicated with patients through a bi-monthly newsletter and a social media page. The PPG members also assisted the practice at the annual flu clinics and used this opportunity to fund raise for local charities and promote the practice PPG.
They had developed and arranged a weekly carers café where they could offer support for patients who were carers.
The PPG members were working with a representative of the local Rotary Club to raise the profile of Admiral Nurses to enable a better service for patients and families living with dementia in the practice and the Rotherham area. They were also visiting local businesses to encourage them to become dementia friendly organisations.
The practice PPG had won the Corkhill Award in 2014 as presented by the National Association of Patient Participation (NAPP). This is an annual award for the PPG considered to be the best in providing all the elements of a successful PPG.
The PPG had also initiated the Rotherham PPG Network in conjunction with the Rotherham CCG and supported and encouraged other PPGs to take on board best practice in the formation and running of a successful PPG. They had also worked with organisations such as NAPP and NHS England on projects to raise the quality standards for PPGs.
The areas where the provider must make improvement are:
The areas where the provider should make improvement are:
- Review actions taken in response to significant events periodically to check these have been implemented appropriately and have been effective.
- Review procedures for recording actions have been taken in response to medical alerts.
-
Put procedures in place to so staff who undertake chaperone duties are trained for this role and staff records reflect this.
- Review arrangements for monitoring the temperature of the vaccine fridge in relation to the provision of thermometers in line with the Public Health England (PHE): Protocol for ordering, storing and handling vaccines, March 2014.
- Consider implementation of written consent for patients prior to minor surgical procedures and contraceptive implants.
- Review and improve access to the practice by telephone and to a named GP.
- Provide patients easy access to information about the complaints procedure in the practice.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice