Updated
7 December 2017
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out a focussed, desk based review inspection at Dr VK Chawla's Practice on 11 October 2017. We found the practice to be good for providing safe services and it is rated as good overall.
We previously conducted an announced comprehensive inspection of the practice on 17 November 2016. As a result of our findings, the practice was rated as requires improvement for providing safe services and rated as good for providing effective, responsive, caring and well led services, which resulted in an overall rating of good. At that time, we found that the provider had breached Regulation 18 (1) (Staffing) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 due to an absence of systems for monitoring the status of staff members’ annual basic life support training.
We undertook this focussed desk based inspection to check that the practice had taken action to meet the legal requirements.
This report only covers our findings in relation to those areas where requirements had not been met. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr VK Chawla's Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk/location/ 1-523702115.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
People with long term conditions
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long term conditions. As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.
Families, children and young people
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people. As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of older people. As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.
Working age people (including those recently retired and students)
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of working age people (including those recently retired and students). As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.
People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.
People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable
Updated
7 December 2017
The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. As the practice was found to be providing good services overall, this did not affect the rating for the population groups we inspect against.