3 April 2017
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr John Davies practice on 18 April 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement and the practice was rated inadequate for being safe. We undertook a focused inspection of the practice on 3 October 2016 and the practice was rated as requires improvement for being safe and well-led. The previous reports can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for for Dr John Davies on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This announced comprehensive inspection was undertaken on 3 April 2017. Overall the practice is now rated as good.
- There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
- The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
- Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
- Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
- Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
- Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.
Importantly, the provider should:
- Review the process for checking emergency medicines to ensure all are reviewed weekly.
- Review the process for tracking blank computer prescription forms and pads to ensure it is in accordance with national guidance.
- Review the process for recording the actions taken in response to national patient safety alerts and medicines recalls.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice