• Dentist
  • Dentist

Bentley Road

325 Bentley Road, Doncaster, DN5 9TG (01302) 782206

Provided and run by:
P.B. Robinson (Doncaster) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 January 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 6 January 2020 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bentley Road Dental Practice is in Doncaster and provides NHS dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice on local roads.

The dental team includes six dentists, six dental nurses and two receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has six treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Bentley Road Dental Practice is the practice manager.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, two dental nurses and the practice manager.

We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 8am – 5:30pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The system to oversee the completion of ‘highly recommended training’ could be improved.
  • The system to ensure staff have adequate immunity for vaccine preventable infectious diseases could be improved.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff awareness of the risks associated with sepsis was limited.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • CCTV was in operation at the practice, a policy and privacy impact assessment were required to support its use.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership.
  • The practice had a culture of continuous improvement; improvements could be made to ensure audits were completed in line with guidance. In particular; radiography audits.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review current systems to ensure staff remain up to date with their continuing professional development. In particular: Safeguarding and infection prevention and control training.
  • Take action to ensure audits of radiography are carried out in line with guidance published by the Faculty of General Dental Practice, Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. The provider should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Take action to ensure that all clinical staff have adequate immunity for vaccine preventable infectious diseases.
  • Take action to ensure all staff have received sepsis awareness training in line with guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
  • Implement protocols for the use of closed-circuit television cameras taking into account the guidelines published by the Information Commissioner's Office.

24 May 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a comprehensive inspection of this practice on 15 September 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the inspection, the practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to person-centred care.

We undertook this focused inspection to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Bentley Road on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Our findings were:

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bentley Road Dental Practice is situated in the Bentley area of Doncaster. It offers mainly NHS treatment to patients of all ages but also offers private dental treatments. The services include preventative advice, treatment and routine restorative dental care.

The practice has six surgeries, two decontamination rooms, an X-ray room, two waiting areas and a reception area. Treatment and waiting rooms are on the ground and first floor of the premises.

There are seven dentists, a dental hygienist, six dental nurses, one receptionist and a practice manager.

The opening hours are Monday to Friday 9-00am to 5-30pm.

The practice manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

Our key findings were:

  • One of the dentists had taken the role of clinical lead.
  • The dentists generally followed guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice in the Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography.

15 September 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 15 September 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bentley Road Dental Practice is situated in the Bentley area of Doncaster. It offers mainly NHS treatment to patients of all ages but also offers private dental treatments. The services include preventative advice, treatment and routine restorative dental care.

The practice has six surgeries, two decontamination rooms, an X-ray room, two waiting areas and a reception area. Treatment and waiting rooms are on the ground and first floor of the premises.

There are six dentists, a dental hygienist, six dental nurses, one receptionist and a practice manager.

The opening hours are Monday to Friday 9-00am to 5-30pm.

The practice manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection 57 people provided feedback. The patients who provided feedback were positive about the care and treatment they received at the practice. They told us they were involved in all aspects of their care, found the staff to be friendly and they were treated with dignity and respect.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had systems in place to assess and manage risks to patients and staff including infection prevention and control, health and safety and the management of medical emergencies.
  • There were clearly defined leadership roles within the practice and staff told us that they felt supported, appreciated and comfortable to raise concerns or make suggestions. Staff received training appropriate to their roles.
  • Patients told us they were treated with kindness and respect by staff. Staff ensured there was sufficient time to explain fully the care and treatment they were providing in a way patients understood. Patients commented they felt involved in their treatment and that it was fully explained to them.
  • Patients were able to make routine and emergency appointments when needed. The practice had a complaints system in place and there was an openness and transparency in how these were dealt with.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Review the practice’s protocols for the taking of X-rays giving due regard to the Faculty of General Dental Practice (FGDP) guidance on the “Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography”.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s protocols for recording in the patients’ dental care records or elsewhere the reason for taking theX-rays and reporting on the X-rays giving due regard to the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (IR(ME)R) 2000.
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental records with regards to documenting discussions about treatment options.
  • Review the practice’s protocols for the use of rubber dam for root canal treatment giving due regard to guidelines issued by the British Endodontic Society.
  • Take action to ensure the appointment books are not visible on the reception desk

Review the practice’s protocol for undertaking regular audits of dental care records.

4 June 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This visit was a follow up to determine compliance with compliance actions issues at our inspection in April 2013. At this visit we did not speak to any people who received a service.

Evidence showed people were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed.

We saw that appropriate checks were undertaken before staff began work.

The practice had an effective well organised system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received. The practice had a complaints policy and took account of complaints and comments to improve the service. People were regularly asked to give feedback in the form of questionnaires. We also saw the results of the questionnaires carried out over the last year, which were mostly positive.

4 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People's needs were assessed and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual treatment plan. The five people we spoke with commented positively about the care and treatment they had received. They told us it was easy to make appointments and waiting times at the practice were minimal.

There were not effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. We saw people were not always protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance was not available and was not followed. We saw areas of the practice that were not clean or well maintained.

We saw that appropriate checks were not always undertaken before staff began work.

Staff received professional development. We saw they had accessed various training so they could meet people's needs and maintain their qualifications. However some training had not been accessed, staff were not supervised and appraisals were over due.

The practice had a system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service people received. However some areas had not been properly monitored so areas of concern had not been identified.