19th and 24th May 2021
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out a desktop follow up inspection at Asquith Surgery on 19h May 2021 and focused on the breaches of regulations following an inspection on 21st and 30 October 2019 under the following key question and population group.
- Safe
The practice was inspected on 21st and 30th October 2019 and was rated Good overall with a rating of Requires Improvement in the Safe key question. Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led and the population groups of Older People, People with Long Term Conditions, Families, Children and Young People, Working Age People(including those recently retired and students), People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) were rated as Good.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Asquith Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this review
This inspection was a review of information without undertaking a site visit inspection to follow up on breaches of Regulations 12 – Safe Care and Treatment and Regulation 19 – Fit and proper persons employed.
This inspection focused on aspects relating to staff immunisation records, patient group directives and recruitment.
How we carried out the inspection/review
Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our reviews differently.
This review was carried out remotely and therefore we did not spend any time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included: -
- Requesting evidence from the provider
- Clarification of evidence with the provider
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we reviewed the evidence sent by the provider
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
At this inspection the practice was Good overall, and rated as Good for Safe services because:
- A system was now in place for staff recruitment and retention
- Records were now kept in regard to staff immunisations
- Improvements had been made to the management of Patient Group Directives to ensure they were signed before they were approved by the lead clinician.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care