• Ambulance service

Archived: Sites Ambulance Station

Unit 4, Canal Bridge, Byfleet Road, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3JE (01483) 801270

Provided and run by:
Sites Ambulance Service Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

27 February 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We visited Sites Ambulance to look at the care and welfare of people who used the service. This was a follow up visit to see if the service had made improvements after our visit in December 2013. We did not speak to people who had used the service during this follow up inspection. We did speak with four staff, which included the provider/manager for the service.

We saw that the provider had ensured improvements had been made to their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) policies and procedures.

3 December 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited Sites Ambulance Service and looked at the care and welfare of people who used the service During this inspection we visited the head office and the ambulance station. Since our last inspection in September 2013 we had received a complaint and information of concern from a whistle blower. We found there were issues related to the procedures in place for the control of infection. All other issues raised by the complainant or whistle blower were not seen during this inspection.

On this occasion we did not speak to people who used the service.

We took a specialist advisor with us. Their focus was the infection control procedures for the ambulance service. The specialist visited the depot where equipment is stored and the ambulances are kept. The provider did not have adequate systems in place to manage cleanliness and infection control. Some of the issues identified would be addressed when the provider moved the ambulance depot to new premises.

We found that maintenance checks had been made on the vehicles and records kept. All vehicle services and MOT’s were up to date.

The provider had ensured that an effective recruitment process was in place and that staff had the qualifications and experience to do the job.

Complaints were taken seriously and records kept of concerns raised with the provider.

3 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited Sites Ambulance Service and looked at the care and welfare of people who used the service During this inspection we visited the head office and the ambulance station.

On the day of inspection we were unable to speak with people who used the service. The provider told us that most of the work undertaken was contracted from two large ambulance trusts. This meant that comments from people would be held by the large ambulance trusts that Sites were contracted with.

We saw that the service had received some compliments from people. One staff member told us of a recent event which resulted in a thank you letter for their professionalism.

From speaking with staff and reviewing documentation used by ambulance staff we saw that there were arrangements in place for obtaining consent from people.

The provider explained to us the procedures in place to work cooperatively with other providers. Roles and responsibilities were clearly defined.

The provider had systems in place for managing cleanliness and infection control. Responsibilities for cleaning were clearly identified and training had been provided to staff.

The staff we spoke with told us they felt supported to do their job. Staff told us that they enjoyed working for Sites Ambulance and they provided them with the training they required.

The Ambulance Service had a complaints policy and staff knew what to do if a patient complained.

9 June 2012

During a routine inspection

We received positive comments from the two people who had been transferred by ambulance between locations, as well as two of the contractors of services who spoke with us.

People said that they felt safe and confident in the ambulance staff who had looked after them. Staff were said to have been very helpful and treated them with dignity and respect, ensuring their comfort and wellbeing.

Representatives of the two contractors told us that the service was professional and responsive in dealing with requests. Staff were described as 'Very professional and reliable.' We were also told that the ambulance staff considered the individual needs of the people who would be using the service, seeking out information in order to ensure that they met their needs.