Archived: WeLoveTeeth

Updated 24 March 2017

The inspection was carried out on 3 February 2017 by a CQC inspector and a dental specialist advisor. We reviewed information received from the provider prior to the inspection. On the day of our inspection we looked at practice’s policies and protocols, clinical patient records and other records relating to the management of the service. We spoke with the principal dentist, an associate dentist, the dental hygienist, two dental nurses and a receptionist. We reviewed 26 Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards that had been completed by patients prior to our inspection.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

This informed our view of the care provided and the management of the practice.

Updated 24 March 2017

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 3 February 2017 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

WeLove Teeth is a private dental practice in Weybridge, Surrey which offers a range of general and cosmetic dental treatment including some orthodontics and implants. The premises are located on the ground and first floor and consist of two dental treatment rooms (on the first floor) and a non-clinical consultation room, reception and waiting area on the ground floor.

The staff at the practice consist of a principal dentist, an associate dentist, a business manager, a dental hygienist, two dental nurses, two dental nurse/receptionists and two dental receptionists.

The principal dentist is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

Our key findings were:

• There was an induction programme for staff to follow which ensured they were skilled and competent in delivering safe and effective care and support to patients.

• The practice ensured staff maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.

• There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. We found the treatment rooms and equipment were visibly clean.

• There were systems in place to check equipment had been serviced regularly, including the dental air compressor, autoclave, fire extinguishers and the washer-disinfector.

• We found the dentists regularly assessed each patient’s gum health and the dentist took X-rays at appropriate intervals.

• The practice kept up to date with current guidelines when considering the care and treatment needs of patients.

• The practice placed an emphasis on the promotion of oral and general health and the prevention of dental disease. Appropriate information and advice was available according to patients’ individual needs.

• Staff had been trained to handle emergencies and appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were readily available.

• Patients received comprehensive assessments of their oral health needs. They were given clear explanations about their proposed treatment, and its costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.

• Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.

• The appointment system met the needs of patients and waiting times were kept to a minimum.

• There was an appropriate complaints system in place to support patients should they wish to make a complaint about their care or treatment.

• Staff demonstrated knowledge of the practice whistleblowing policy and were confident they would raise a concern about another staff member’s performance if it was necessary.

• At our visit we observed staff were kind, caring, very welcoming and worked well as a team.

• We reviewed 26 Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards that had been completed by patients prior to our inspection. Common themes were patients felt they received excellent care from staff who were kind, gentle and caring.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

• Review the practice protocols for the testing of X-ray equipment to ensure compliance with its legal obligations under Ionising Radiation Regulations (IRR) 99.