• Dentist
  • Dentist

Andrew Hargreaves Dental Practice

66 Chapel St, Lye, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY9 8BX (01384) 895213

Provided and run by:
Dr. Andrew Hargreaves

All Inspections

28 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 28 March 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate emergency medicines and most life-saving equipment were available. Missing equipment including, a paediatric self-inflating bag, masks and an airway were ordered immediately after the inspection.
  • The five yearly electrical fixed wire testing had not been undertaken, however the provider sent us evidence this had been completed following the inspection.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. However, we found references missing for the newest member of staff.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and staff took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • There was effective leadership, however not all required audits were completed to ensure a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The dental clinic had information governance arrangements. However, there were not always clear and effective processes for managing risks, issues and performance. For example, x-ray equipment had not been serviced.

Background

Andrew Hargreaves Dental Practice is in Stourbridge, West Midlands and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with additional needs.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse and two part time receptionists. The practice has one treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, one dental nurse and one receptionist.

The practice is open:

  • Monday 9am to 1pm, 2pm to 4.30pm
  • Tuesday 9am to 1pm, 2pm to 5pm
  • Wednesday 9am to 1pm, 2pm to 6pm
  • Thursday 9am to 1pm, 2pm to 6pm
  • Friday 9am to 1pm

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure audits of radiography, infection prevention and control, antimicrobial prescribing and patient clinical notes are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service. Practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's Legionella risk assessment, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.’ In particular, ensure, hot water sentinel checks are over the required 55 degrees and the hot and cold water temperatures are checked every month.
  • Improve the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment.
  • Develop systems to ensure an effective process is established for the on-going assessment, supervision and appraisal of all staff. Including the training, learning and development needs.

26 June 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook this follow up visit in response to concerns that we had identified during our previous inspection of the service in 17 October 2013. Our visit was discussed and arranged with the provider in advance so that any disruption to people's care and treatment were minimised.

At our previous inspection we found that the dentist (who was also the registered provider) had no system in place to support staff to deliver appropriate care. For example through regular appraisals, staff meetings and induction processes for new staff. We found that a complaints system was in place but this was not displayed so that patients were aware of the procedure to make complaints.

We also found that the provider did not have adequate records of staff training and recruitment processes for staff.

The provider sent us an action plan following the inspection in October 2013 detailing the actions they were going to take to address this issue. During this inspection we spoke to the dentist, a receptionist and a dental nurse. We found that the provider had taken on board findings from our previous inspection and had made appropriate changes.

We saw that staff were supported to s deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

A complaints system was now in place and was displayed so that it was easily accessible to patients.

We saw that improvements were being made to records so that accurate information about staff were being kept.

17 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to ensure that improvements had been made in relation to concerns identified at our inspection on the 11 April 2013. We spoke with the temporary dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager who was also the provider. We did not speak to people who used the service as the outcomes we inspected people would not have been able to comment on.

The staff we spoke with told us they were able to raise concerns they had on a daily basis with the dentist. We found that there was now a formal process for staff to have appraisals however there was still no process to record any discussions with staff. This meant that where staff potentially raised concerns these were not being recorded and therefore no proof of any actions that may be required.

People we spoke with at our previous inspection told us they would raise concerns with the receptionist if they had a complaint, but there was some uncertainty. We found that the provider had prepared a draft document to be displayed to tell people how they could complain, however this was not on display. The provider was awaiting further information before displaying the process.

We found improvements had been made in relation to record keeping since our last inspection. Staff files were now in place and there was some evidence of an auditing system to check on the quality of the service provided to ensure safe practices.

11 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection to check on the care and treatment of people. Following the inspection we conducted telephone interviews with five people. On the day of the inspection we spoke to the dentist, dental nurse and the receptionist.

The practice consists of a reception/waiting area a treatment room and a toilet which were both wheelchair accessible. The practice also had a ramp for people with mobility issues and a decontamination area.

People told us the practice was good and they are always asked for their consent to treatment. One person said, 'They are very supportive to me and always helps me with moving from my wheelchair' and 'My consent is always sought before treatment'.

The treatment people received was reflected in their records.

The decontamination process being followed was within current guidelines and the environment was clean and tidy.

The provider did not ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable people and of good character before employment commenced.

The provider did not have suitable arrangements in place to ensure staff had professional development, supervision, appraisals and regular meetings.

The provider had a process in place to allow for complaints, but the process was not visible to people. One person said, 'I am happy with the service I receive and don't have a complaint but I wouldn't know how to complain'.

We found that the provider had no proper recording system for checks/audits carried out.