• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Aylesbury Supported Living Service

Woodley House, 64-65 Rabans Close, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP19 8RS (01296) 393000

Provided and run by:
The Fremantle Trust

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

31 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people using the service. Each person said they were happy with the quality and amount of support they received. We saw people were encouraged to be independent wherever possible.

We joined one person in their flat at lunchtime. They told us staff were around to support them when they needed help with shopping, meal preparation and cooking. The person told us staff helped them to eat healthily. They said this was their choice. We found people had a varied diet and their nutrition and hydration needs were met.

We saw people's medicines were managed safely. Some people were able to manage their own medication. Staff who handled medication had undertaken training on the safe management of medicines. Medicines were stored securely and accurate records were maintained.

There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place at the service. We looked at three staff recruitment files. Each file contained the necessary checks and clearances. This ensured staff had the right skills and experience and were suitable to work with vulnerable adults.

6 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We saw that people who used the service had a communication passport that identified how they communicate their wishes and choices, this was prepared with the person and others who know them well.

People's needs were assessed and they were consulted in the planning of their care plans and service delivery. Care plans noted the people's preferred routines, how people communicate, likes and dislikes, leisure and social activities.

They contained information on the number of hours of support agreed, when and how these were to be used. Documentation was provided in a format which was suitable for the individuals communication needs such as pictures and symbols.

We saw that they had a robust recruitment process in place resulting in a staff team that had the qualifications, skills and experienced to meet people's individual needs and that they had received regular training. The training manager told us 23 of the 30 staff employed have an NVQ level two or above, one other person is currently working through a NVQ level two.

We were told that people who used the service and their relatives, were made aware of the complaints policy. We saw that this was provided in an easy read format, a copy of the easy read complaints policy was attached to the provider's statement of purpose and the service user's guide. A person who used the service told us "If they were unhappy they would tell the manager".

25 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People said they were supported to plan their meals, cook and shop for food. We saw a member of staff encouraging one person to help prepare her evening meal. We observed staff checking with one person if it was alright to get money from her safe to take with her when she went out for the evening. People said they were happy for agreements to be in place where staff handled things on their behalf, such as their money. People said they could decide when they got up and went to bed.

People that we spoke with said their care plans reflected the support they needed. They told us they received support when they needed it and they were not rushed. They said they could stay in their own flats if they wanted to or they could use the communal areas. People told us they were supported to attend medical appointments.

People that we spoke with did not raise any concerns about their care. They said they knew who they could talk to if they were unhappy. People said that staff did not make purchases on their behalf without them being present.

Staff that we spoke with said they felt supported in their roles and that there were good training opportunities. They also considered that there were sufficient hours allocated to be able to meet people's needs.