• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Atiba House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

50-51 Sweetman Street, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV6 0EN (01902) 425627

Provided and run by:
African Caribbean Community Initiative (A.C.C.I.)

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 7 August 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection visit was carried out by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

This service provides care and support to people living in a ‘supported living’ setting, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was announced.

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

Inspection activity started on 8 July 2019 and ended on 9 July 2019. We visited the office location on 9 July 2019.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

During our inspection we spoke with one person who used the service, two relatives, three members of care staff, the housing service manager and the registered manager. We did this to gain people's views about the care and to check that standards of care were being met.

We looked at care records for three people. We checked the care they received matched the information in their records. We also looked at records relating to the management of the service, including audits carried out within the home.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 7 August 2019

About the service

The provider is registered with us to provide personal care and support for people who live in their own homes. At the time of our inspection eight people received care and support from this service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People received safe care by staff that knew them well. There were enough staff available for people who had the necessary training and experience. Risks to people were considered and reviewed and lessons learnt when things went wrong. Medicines were managed in a safe way. There were infection control procedures in place.

People were supported by staff they were happy with. People were encouraged to remain independent, offered choices and their privacy and dignity was maintained. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

Feedback was sought from people and relatives who used the service, this was used to make changes. There were systems in place to manage the quality within the service. There was a registered manager in place who understood their responsibility around registration with us. Staff felt supported and listened to.

People received care based on their assessed needs. Peoples preferences were taken in to account. People had the opportunity to participate in activities they enjoyed. There was a complaints procedure in place.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good. (14 February 2017)

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.