• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Archived: Randox Health London Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Finsbury House, 23 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EA

Provided and run by:
Randox Health London Ltd

All Inspections

6 June 2019

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection: 31 May 2018, when it was found to be meeting the relevant standards).

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Randox Health London Ltd on 31 May 2019 as part of our inspection programme. A copy of our previous inspection report can be found by going to https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-2209414431 and selecting the Reports tab.

When we previously inspected the service in May 2018 we found the service was meeting the relevant standards, however, we identified some areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the inclusion of child safeguarding, basic life support and Mental Capacity Act as part of the mandatory training.
  • Consider implementing a two-cycle audit process as part of quality improvement activities.
  • Review the patient consent form and consider including a provision to share information with the patient’s NHS GP.
  • Review the effectiveness of the current portable wheelchair ramp used to assist patients into the building.

As part of this inspection patients of the service were asked to give feedback to CQC about their experiences of using the service. We received responses about the service from 19 people. All comments we received were positive about the service with patients mentioning: staff were courteous professional and caring, the clinic was always clean when they visited and all their questions were answered.

Randox Health London is a private healthcare service providing health assessments for its patients using a range of screening processes. The screening process involves taking blood, urine samples

and noting the patient’s bio-measurements, which includes height, weight, pulse and blood pressure readings. Patients purchase tests from a range of packages which include up to 350 biomarkers. Samples are tested in the onsite laboratory, which is registered as a separate entity..

Following the assessment and screening process, patients have a consultation with a healthcare expert (either a scientific consultant or a GP) to discuss the findings and any recommended lifestyle changes. Where necessary referrals to other services are made, for example to a specialist consultant.

Our key findings were:

  • The service was in contact with its landlord to consider options for improving access for people who use wheelchairs.
  • Mandatory training for all staff included child safeguarding, basic life support and the Mental Capacity Act.
  • There was a system in place for recording and acting on significant events.
  • We saw no evidence of discrimination when making care and treatment decisions.
  • Feedback from patients was positive about the way staff treated people.
  • Information about how to make a complaint or raise concerns was available.
  • Leaders were knowledgeable about issues and priorities relating to the quality and future of services.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review and consider implementing use of local guidelines for antibiotic prescribing.
  • Encourage patients to consent to information sharing with their NHS GP so it can form part of their lifetime medical record, and also create a protocol to appropriately list the medicines the service would not prescribe in the absence of consent to share information with the patients NHS GP.
  • Consider implementing completed two-cycle clinical audit as part of quality improvement activity.
  • Consider introducing a written risk assessment for medicines the service would not prescribe in the absence of consent to share information with patients NHS GP.
  • Review and update all service policies and procedures regularly, to ensure they remain relevant.
  • Continue to work to improve access for patients using wheelchairs.
  • Introduce a formal agreement for the retention of medical records in line with Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) guidance in the event the service ceases trading.
  • Review and consider implementing regular checking of the water supply in line with recommendations in the most recent legionella test report.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGPChief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

31 May 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 31 May 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations. We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Randox Health London is a private healthcare service that provides health assessments for its patients using a range of screening processes. Following the assessment and screening process patients undergo a consultation with a healthcare expert to discuss the findings and any recommended lifestyle changes. Where necessary referrals to other services are made, for example to a specialist consultant.

The clinic manager for the service is also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We spoke with two patients on the telephone and reviewed the service’s online patient survey for 2016-2017. The comments were positive about the staff and the service provided.

Our key findings were:

There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

•The service was offered on a private fee-paying basis for adults only.

•The service had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.

•Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

•Patients were provided with information about their health and with advice and guidance to support them to live healthier lives.

•Patients we spoke with and results from the service’s independent online survey demonstrated that patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

•Information about services and how to complain was available.

•The service had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

•There were clinical governance systems and processes in place to ensure the quality of service provision. Staff had access to all standard operating procedures and policies.

•There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The service proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

•Review the inclusion of child safeguarding, basic life support and Mental Capacity Act as part of the mandatory training.

•Consider implementing a 2-cycle audit process to help measure the quality of improvement.

•Review the consent form and consider including a provision to share information with the patient’s NHS GP.

•Review the effectiveness of the current portable wheelchair ramp used to assist patients into the building.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice