29 Jan 2020
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection of Cater Street Surgery on 29 January 2020. This inspection was undertaken to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulation set out in warning notices we issued to the provider for Regulation 12 Safe care and treatment and Regulation 17 Good governance.
The practice received an overall rating of inadequate at our inspection on 13 November 2019 and this will remain unchanged until we undertake a further full comprehensive inspection within six months of the publication date of the initial report.
The full comprehensive report from the November 2019 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cater Street Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Our inspection team was led by a CQC inspector and included a GP specialist advisor.
Our judgement of the quality of care at this service is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
This service was placed in special measures in November 2019. Following a further inspection in January 2020, where we found insufficient improvements we took action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. We will now move to close the service by adopting our proposal to cancel the providers registration. The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action.
Our Key findings:
- The practice was not compliant with the warning notices issued in November 2019.
- Some improvements to the oversight of safety alerts had been made however, records we checked showed appropriate actions were not being taken.
- Some improvements to the systems to manage patients who were prescribed medicines that required additional monitoring had been introduced however, these were not effective and clinical records we checked showed that not all patients had received appropriate blood testing prior to prescribing.
- The practice had developed a safeguarding register and had met with a health visitor to discuss vulnerable children however, there were no systems in place to discuss vulnerable adults with community teams.
- Some of the backlog of new patient summaries had been cleared however, there was still records from December that had not been completed. The practice could give no assurance that there was not safeguarding information in these records.
- The methods of managing safeguarding correspondence into the practice was lacking.
- A fire risk assessment and legionella risk assessment had been completed and we saw some remedial work had taken place however mitigating actions to reduce the risk of legionella, such as water temperature checks, were not being completed.
- The practice did not hold complete records of staff immunisations and vaccinations.
- There was ineffective recall systems to ensure patients had received reviews and care plans were not consistently being completed.
- Staff had completed training in safeguarding, fire and infection prevention and control however, two members of clinical staff had not completed basic life support training in the last twelve months and one member of staff had not completed equality and diversity training.
- There had been no improvements to increase access to the practice via the telephone or availability of appointments.
- Some assessment of clinical competency had been completed, however this was lacking and there were no plans in place to address problems with staff performance.
- Communication with staff remained poor and some staff told us they felt unsupported. They were unaware of new processes that had been developed.
- There was ineffective governance systems and a lack of a cohesive management team.
The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:
- Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
- Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BS BM BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care