• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Askew Dental Care

149 Askew Road, Shepherds Bush, London, W12 9AU (020) 8811 1116

Provided and run by:
Dr. Azad Beck

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

27 October 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 27 October 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Askew Dental Care is in Shepherds Bush in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is ramp access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs.

The practice is located close to public transport links and car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, one hygienist, one trainee dental nurse and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

Due to the number of patient appointments scheduled with the principal dentist on the day of the inspection, and to minimise disruption to the practice appointment schedule, we carried out a video call with the principal dentist ahead of the inspection and discussed practice protocols and procedures.

On the day of the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the trainee dental nurse and the receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Thursday from 9.00am to 5.30pm

Friday from 9.00am to 4.00pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.
  • Improvements were needed to the systems to help the provider manage risks to patients and staff.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice’s systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating the various risks arising from the undertaking of the regulated activities. In particular risks relating to the handling and disposal of dental sharps, fire and gas safety.
  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

4 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people who were very happy with the quality of care and treatment they received. Most were long term patients who said they were always given good information to help them make decisions about their care and treatment. We also looked at the analysed survey results from March 2013 and fifty two survey forms completed in October 2013. People's responses showed that they rated the practice highly, with most areas scoring very well. The practice saw a mix of private and NHS patients and people appeared equally satisfied with their care and treatment. A typical comment was 'I feel privileged to have care so good so close to home.'

The dentist took a detailed medical history from each person on their first appointment and then updated it regularly. Everyone had a treatment plan and received aftercare advice. There was emergency equipment available in the surgery and all staff had received life support training.

There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk of infection. Staff showed us the decontamination procedure and we saw evidence of regular checks and audits.

There were effective systems in place to monitor the quality of the service. Staff held regular meetings to review the quality of service and people's feedback. There were a range of checks and audits in place.