• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Cheshire Dental Centre

146 Bedford Street, Crewe, Cheshire, CW2 6JG (01270) 256426

Provided and run by:
Mrs Stephanie Anne Zapolski

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16/06/2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow-up desk-based, focused inspection of Cheshire Dental Centre on 16 June 2020. The inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the provider to improve the quality of care, and to confirm whether the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector with remote access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Cheshire Dental Centre on 30 January 2020 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. At a comprehensive inspection we always ask the following five questions to get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive?

• Is it well-led?

We found the provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulations 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Cheshire Dental Centre on our website www.cqc.org.uk

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the provider to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas in which improvement was necessary.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we identified at our inspection on 30 January 2020.

Background

Cheshire Dental Centre is near the centre of Crewe and provides NHS and private dental care for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and for people with pushchairs. The provider had installed a ramp to facilitate access to the practice for wheelchairs and pushchairs.

Car parking is available outside the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, a dental hygiene therapist, and four dental nurses, one of whom is a trainee. The dental team is supported by a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

As part of this desk-based inspection we reviewed the provider’s action plan and evidence sent to us to support the action plan.

The practice is open:

Monday 10.30am to 7.00pm

Tuesday and Thursday 9.00am to 5.30pm

Wednesday 11.00am to 8.00pm

Friday 9.00am to 4.00pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had acted to further reduce risks from fire at the practice.
  • The practice’s recruitment procedures had been improved and checklists were in use to ensure pre-employment checks were carried out and the required information obtained
  • The provider had improved their systems to support governance in the practice, including in relation to quality assurance testing for X-ray equipment, investigating and learning from significant events, and monitoring safety alerts.

30/01/2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 30 January 2020 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Cheshire Dental Centre is near the centre of Crewe. The practice provides NHS and private dental care for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and for people with pushchairs. The provider had installed a ramp to facilitate access to the practice for wheelchairs and pushchairs.

Car parking is available outside the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, a dental hygiene therapist, and four dental nurses, one of whom is a trainee. The dental team is supported by a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the main partner there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of the inspection, we collected 15 CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke to the principal dentist, dental nurses and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday 10.30am to 7.00pm

Tuesday and Thursday 9.00am to 5.30pm

Wednesday 11.00am to 8.00pm

Friday 9.00am to 4.00pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was visibly clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures in place which reflected published guidance.
  • The provider had safeguarding procedures in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and equipment were available.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures in place. These did not reflect the relevant legal requirements.
  • Staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines but did not take into account all recognised guidance.
  • The dental team provided preventive care and supported patients to achieve better oral health.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had a procedure in place for handling complaints. The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had a leadership and management structure.
  • The provider had systems in place to manage risk. These were not all operating effectively.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider had systems to support the management and delivery of the service, to support governance and to guide staff. These were not all operating effectively.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.
  • Ensure specified information is available regarding each person employed

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's Legionella risk assessment, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.’ In particular in relation to flushing of little-used outlets.
  • Take action to ensure the clinicians carry out orthodontic patient assessments in sufficient detail and ensure they take into account relevant nationally recognised evidence-based guidance.
  • Improve and develop staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role.
  • Review the practice’s protocols in relation to the use of closed-circuit television to ensure patients are fully informed as to its purpose and their right to access footage taking into account the guidelines published by the Information Commissioner's Office.

20 June 2013

During a routine inspection

When we carried out our inspection we spoke to three patients who attended the practice on the day of our visit and asked about their experiences of treatment there.

One person said that they had been a patient for over 20 years, were happy with the treatment and had no concerns. Another patient said they had been with the practice for a long time, were happy with the explanations of treatment offered and the treatment itself. A third patient said of their dentist 'I like the man, he treats me very well'. They said they were a nervous patient and that the dentist always took this into account.

They also told us that they were offered protection in the form of bibs and glasses when they received treatment.

We saw that the practice worked to clinical protocols including for the provision of conscious sedation and there were suitable arrangements in place to deal with emergencies.

The practice was hygienically clean and there were proper arrangements in place for the decontamination of reusable instruments.

Equipment was properly maintained and the arrangements for maintaining and monitoring the safe use of x-rays met the regulations.

Staff were well supported and had opportunities for professional development.