• Dentist
  • Dentist

Benson Street Dental and Beauty

3 Benson Street, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA12 7AG (01229) 584051

Provided and run by:
Dr. Monica Elisabeth Forsman

All Inspections

23 November 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Benson Street Dental and Beauty on 23 November 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Benson Street Dental and Beauty on 16 August 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Benson Street Dental and Beauty on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 16 August 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 16 August 2022.

16 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 16 August 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic was visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures in place; these did not fully reflect recognised guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Some items recommended to be held as part of emergency life-saving equipment were not available, and one of the medicines held was not in the correct format.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff. Knowledge of and adherence to these systems was insufficient; some practice policies to support staff safety were out of date.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place for child safeguarding. There was no protocol or policy in place for staff to refer to for adult safeguarding concerns.
  • The practice did not have staff recruitment procedures and processes in place which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines. Governance in the issuing of medicines to patients and provision of information to patients receiving medicines required greater oversight and management.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and staff took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Staff worked as a team to ensure patients experienced a good standard of care.
  • The dental clinic had information governance arrangements.

Background

Benson Street Dental and Beauty is in Ulverston, Cumbria and provides private dental care and treatment for predominantly adults. It does provide services to children as and when requested.

Entry to the practice is via two flights of stairs. The practice is not accessible to those with mobility issues.

Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice in pay and display car parks.

The dental team includes three dentists, one of whom undertakes orthodontic treatment, four dental nurses, one of whom is a trainee, one dental hygienist, two decontamination room technicians, one of whom also works on reception, one practice co-ordinator, a receptionist and the practice manager. The practice has two treatment rooms and one beauty room.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) does not regulate the beauty treatments provided by this practice and as such, this inspection report does not comment on beauty treatments provided by the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental hygienist, one receptionist, a decontamination room technician, and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open Monday 8am to 4pm; Tuesday 8.30am to 5.30pm; Wednesday 8am to 5pm; Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm; and on Friday 8am to 4pm. The practice opens approximately two Saturdays per month, based on patient need, when the practice will open from 8am to 12pm.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's waste handling protocols to ensure waste is segregated and disposed of in compliance with the relevant regulations and taking into account the guidance issued in the Health Technical Memorandum 07-01.
  • Take action to ensure the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.

3 July 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We saw that a new application form had been devised for all future applicants. There was a new employee health questionnaire which was to be completed by all applicants. We also saw that a new checklist had been developed for identifying the requirements for individuals to undertake for their induction training.

3 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people using the service (patients) and two members of staff.

People who use the service understood the care and treatment choices available to them. The patients we spoke with felt the staff treated them in a friendly and respectful manner. One person said, "The staff are brilliant. They are very friendly and explain everything properly.''

Patients told us they were very satisfied with their dental treatment. One person we spoke with told us, 'I'm told about the benefits of having my treatment.''The patient survey results showed that in an emergency situation 59% of patients were seen the same day or within in the next two working days.

Staff we spoke with had an understanding of what to do if they had any concerns about their patients and/or if they witnessed any kind of poor practice especially for children who regularly failed to attend appointments.

We discussed infection control, the sterilisation of equipment and instruments with a dental nurse. She told us that staff were responsible for, and trained in, these procedures.

The recruitment of staff did not include all of the appropriate checks to ensure that staff were of good character or physically and mentally fit for the work they were employed to do.

We saw the results from the annual patients' survey this provided a lot of information that the practice could develop on. The survey overall provided very positive feedback about the experiences of people using the service.