• Dentist
  • Dentist

The Hollies Dental Practice

33 Woodbridge Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1ED (01483) 564233

Provided and run by:
Mr. Gary Hill

All Inspections

20 April 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a desk based follow up review of The Hollies Dental Practice on 20 April 2021. This inspection was carried out to assess in detail the actions taken by the provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported remotely by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of The Hollies Dental Practice on 16 July 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulations 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Hollies Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this review we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 16 July 2019.

Background

The Hollies Dental Practice is in Guildford and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is no level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the rear of the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse and two receptionists. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

For this desk based review the provider sent us records to show where improvements had been made.

The practice is open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 6.00pm.
  • Friday 8.30am to 1pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider has ensured specific information is available regarding each person employed.
  • Appropriate emergency equipment is available and there is a system to monitor stock emergency medicines and their expiry dates.
  • All staff have completed safeguarding and basic first aid training.
  • The provider has completed regular radiograph audits.
  • Infection control audits have been completed at least twice yearly.
  • Staff appraisals are formally recorded.
  • A Disability Access Audit has been completed.
  • A review of practice policies has taken place.

We are mindful of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. We will continue to discharge our regulatory enforcement functions required to keep people safe and to hold providers to account where it is necessary for us to do so.

16 July 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 16 July 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

The Hollies Dental practice is in Guilford and provides private treatment to adults and children.

There is no level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the rear of the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse, one dental hygienist and two receptionists. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected 17 CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, one dental nurse and one receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open Monday 08.30-18.00 Friday 8.30-13.00

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. However not all appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had some systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had some suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had a staff recruitment procedure.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider did not effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider did not have suitable information governance arrangements.

Full details of the regulation/s the provider was/is not meeting are at the end of this report.

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care
  • Ensure specified information is available regarding each person employed

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should

  • Review the training, learning and development needs of individual staff members at appropriate intervals and ensure an effective process is established for the on-going assessment, supervision and appraisal of all staff.
  • Review the practice's protocols and procedures to ensure staff are up to date with their mandatory training and their continuing professional development.
  • Review the current staffing arrangements to ensure all dental care professionals are adequately supported by a trained member of the dental team when treating patients in a dental setting taking into account the guidance issued by the General Dental Council.
  • Review the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Review the practice’s protocols for the use of rubber dam for root canal treatment taking into account guidelines issued by the British Endodontic Society.

20 February 2012

During a routine inspection

Patients who spoke with us indicated that they were very satisfied with the services provided at The Hollies Dental Practice. They felt that they had been fully informed about their treatment and care needs, had been involved at all stages of their care, and made aware of their progress.

Staff were said to be very professional in their duties and respected the dignity and rights of each person. Preferences and choices had been taken into account when planning and agreeing individual treatment.