• Dentist
  • Dentist

Spires Dental Practice

7 Queen Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 6QD (01543) 411088

Provided and run by:
Spires Dental Practice

All Inspections

18 March 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up desk-based review of Spires dental practice on 18 March 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Spires Dental Practice on 12 February 2020 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Spires Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked: Remove as appropriate:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan (requirement notice only). We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 12 February 2020.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 12 February 2020.

Background

Spires Dental Practice is in Lichfield, Staffordshire and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available in pay and display car parks near the practice, some time restricted parking is available on the road opposite the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, five dental nurses, including a lead nurse and a practice co-ordinator, two dental hygiene therapists and one receptionist. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we checked that the registered provider’s action plan had been implemented. We reviewed a range of documents provided by the registered provider.

The practice is open: Monday from 9am to 5pm, Tuesday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 9am to 7pm, Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm, Saturday 8am to 12pm.

Our key findings were:

Improvements had been made to the storage and management of medicines, including those to be used in a medical emergency. Monitoring checks demonstrated that medicines were correctly stored, available and within their expiry date. Stock control systems were in place for medicines to be dispensed at the practice. Appropriate dispensing information was recorded on medicines’ dispensing labels.

Fire safety systems and processes had been reviewed. Fire safety equipment was subject to routine service and maintenance. Fire drills were completed by staff. An external professional has been booked to complete a fire risk assessment.

The practice had implemented systems and processes for learning and continuous improvement including developing the practice’s protocols for auditing patient dental care records. Staff had completed update training regarding infection prevention and control and safeguarding children and vulnerable adults. Further action should be taken to ensure staff are trained to the appropriate level.

Improvements had been made to assessment and management of risks. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health risk assessments had been completed. Sharps management procedures had been improved and some action had been taken regarding the secure storage of clinical waste, but further action was required.

Improvements had been made to recruitment processes, although further action is required.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's fire safety risk assessment and ensure ongoing fire safety management is effective.

Improve the practice's waste handling protocols to ensure waste is segregated and disposed of in compliance with the relevant regulations and taking into account the guidance issued in the Health Technical Memorandum 07-01.

Take action to ensure that all the staff have received training, to an appropriate level, in the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults.

Implement an effective recruitment procedure to ensure that appropriate checks are completed prior to new staff commencing employment at the practice.

12 February 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 12 February 2020 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Spires Dental Practice is in Lichfield, Staffordshire and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available in pay and display car parks near the practice, some time restricted parking is available on the road opposite the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, five dental nurses, including a lead nurse, practice co-ordinator and two trainee dental nurses, three dental hygiene therapists and one receptionist. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected 43 CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, two dental nurses, one dental hygiene therapist, the receptionist and the practice co-ordinator. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday from 9am to 3pm, Tuesday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 9am to 7pm, Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm, Saturday 8am to 12pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Some equipment to be used in a medical emergency was not available, this was ordered on the day of inspection.
  • The provider had some systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff. We noted some areas of risk that had not been identified; these required further oversight.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children, although some staff required update training regarding safeguarding.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which mostly reflected current legislation. References or other evidence of previous satisfactory conduct were not available for all staff. The practice did not have proof that some staff were adequately protected against the risk of hepatitis B and there was no risk assessment in place regarding this.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Patients were positive about all aspects of the service the practice provided and spoke highly of the treatment they received, and of the staff who delivered it.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs. The practice provided extended opening hours two days per week and were accommodating to patients’ needs at other times.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice’s sharps procedures to ensure the practice is in compliance with the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.
  • Take action to ensure that all clinical staff have adequate immunity for vaccine preventable infectious diseases.
  • Take action to ensure the service takes into account the needs of patients with disabilities and to comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.
  • Improve the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.
  • Improve and develop staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Gillick competence. Ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act and the principle as it relates to their role.

19 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people who used the service and three members of staff. We also spoke with the dentist.

The people we spoke with were happy with the service, and the way they were treated. The practice offered private dental care only to adult patients and to children whose parent (or responsible adult) was registered at the practice.

We saw that the practice had a ground floor entrance but that all surgery rooms were on either the first or second floors. This meant that people with limited mobility would be unable to reach the dental surgery. The practice, were aware of this and at the time of inspection were reviewing their location and options to make the surgeries accessible to all.

The practice offered a good range of appropriate information about oral and dental health. We found that the practice accommodated sessions for emergency treatments as they were needed.

The practice was clean and tidy throughout. We found that appropriate steps were taken to manage and reduce the risks of infection.

Staff were encouraged to undertake appropriate professional development and were registered with the British Dental Council which is a professional requirement.

We saw that there were comment books and suggestion boxes throughout the practice. People told us they had chosen the practice as it had been recommended to them or that they had heard about it from other people.