• Dentist
  • Dentist

Jordan Dental Sinfin

Sinfin Moor Health Centre, Sinfin District Centre, Sinfin, Derby, Derbyshire, DE24 3DS (01332) 973080

Provided and run by:
D M Jordan Limited

All Inspections

15 October 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 October 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Jordan Dental Sinfin is in the Sinfin area of Derby to the south of the city and provides NHS and private dental treatment to adults and children.

The dental team includes three dentists and three dental nurses, two receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms and an instrument decontamination room. All three treatment rooms are located on the ground floor. There is level access with automatic doors into the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the rear of the practice in the medical centre car park. This includes parking spaces for blue badge holders and those with restricted mobility.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Jordan Dental Sinfin is the practice manager.

On the day of inspection, we collected six CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, two dental nurses, two receptionists, the practice manager and managers from the provider organisation. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday: from 8.30am to 6pm, Tuesday: from 8.30am to 8pm, and Wednesday to Friday: 8.30am to 5.30pm and alternate Saturdays from 9am to 1pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had suitable information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve staff awareness of their responsibilities in relation to the duty of candour to ensure compliance with The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

8 May 2014

During a routine inspection

When we last visited the location we found the provider did not have fully effective recruitment and selection procedures in place. We therefore asked them to make some improvements. The provider sent us an action plan telling us they had made the necessary improvements and this visit was to check to see if those improvements had been made.

During this visit we found the provider had made improvements and had taken the required steps to ensure staff were safe to work with vulnerable adults. Also that they could be assured that these staff were of suitable character to work with vulnerable

adults and children.

We did not speak with people during this visit.

15, 18 October 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us they felt the practice delivered care and treatment in a way that met their needs and felt safe when they had treatment. One person said "The location is handy for me and I've always had good treatment” and another person said " "Staff are friendly and I always feel at ease when visiting".

People told us they felt safe at the service. Staff provided us with examples of types of abuse and possible signs of abuse. They were aware of the reporting procedure for safeguarding issues and had seen a copy of the practice's safeguarding policy.

We saw that there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. People also told us the practice was clean.

The provider did not have an effective recruitment and selection procedures in place and did not retain required background documentation about staff.

The provider had clear systems in place to obtain feedback from all persons involved in the service as well as auditing their own service.