• Dentist
  • Dentist

Paget Dental Practice

61 Manor Road, Wallington, Surrey, SM6 0DE (020) 8669 5399

Provided and run by:
Paget Dental Practice

All Inspections

26 October 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Paget Dental Practice on 26 October 2020. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a focused inspection of Paget Dental Practice on 9 December 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Paget Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and we set a date by which they should become compliant. We then inspected again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 9 December 2019.

Background

Paget Dental Practice is in Wallington in the London Borough of Sutton and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice for blue badge holders. Unrestricted parking is also available near the practice on road surrounding the practice.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Paget Dental Practice is one of the principal dentists.

During the inspection we spoke with both principal dentists. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed (some of this information was sent ahead of the inspection).

The practice is open:

8.00 - 5.00pm Monday to Fridays

9.00 - 1.00pm Saturdays

They operate extended opening until 6.30pm on Thursdays.

Our key findings were:

  • Appropriate governance processes were in place for the effective running of the service.
  • Staff were aware of how and where key documents were stored and could access them in a timely manner.

9 December 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Paget Dental Practice on 9 December 2019. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Paget Dental Practice on 30 April 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Paget Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made sufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 30 April 2019.

Background

Paget Dental Practice is in Wallington in the London Borough of Sutton and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice for blue badge holders. Parking is also available near the practice.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Paget Dental Practice is one of the principal dentists.

During the inspection we spoke with the registered manager and two receptionists. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

8.00am – 5.00pm Monday to Fridays.

9.00am – 1.00pm Saturdays

They operate extended opening until 6.30pm on Thursdays.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had improved with regards to protocols and procedures for promoting the maintenance of good oral health.

  • The practice had improved with regards to completion of dental care records

  • The practice had improved with regards to ensuring persons employed in the service were recruited in line with the regulations and appropriate records maintained of the recruitment checks

  • The practice still needed to review their protocols and staff awareness of their responsibilities in relation to the duty of candour to ensure compliance with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

  • The registered person continued to have systems and processes in place that operated ineffectively in that they failed to ensure compliance with the requirements of the fundamental standards as set out in the Health and social care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

30 April 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 30 April 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Paget Dental Practice is in Wallington in the London borough of Sutton and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice for blue badge holders. Parking is also available near the practice.

The dental team includes a practice manager, three dentists, three dental nurses, one trainee dental nurse, one dental hygienist and three receptionists (one of whom was a qualified dental nurse). The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Paget Dental Practice is one of principal dentists. A registered manager is legally responsible for the delivery of services for which the practice is registered

On the day of inspection, we collected eight CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, three dental nurses, two receptionists and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: 8.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Fridays. (Thursdays open until 6.30pm) and Saturdays from 9.00am to 1.00pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider asked patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines. Although this was not always documented suitably in patients’ dental care records.
  • Staff were providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health. Although this was not always documented in dental care records
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available. Although improvements were required.
  • There was a lack of evidence available on the day of the inspection to demonstrate that the practice completed essential recruitment checks.
  • Improvements were required with regards to governance arrangements.
  • Improvements were required with regards to having systems in place to manage risk to patients and staff.
  • Improvements were required to the staff recruitment procedures.
  • The provider did not demonstrate effective leadership nor was there a culture of continuous improvement.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided to patients in a way that is safe
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure specified information is available regarding each person employed

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice's protocol and staff awareness of their responsibilities in relation to the duty of candour to ensure compliance with The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.
  • Review the practice’s protocols and procedures for promoting the maintenance of good oral health taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health publication ‘Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention’
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

5 August 2013

During a routine inspection

When we last inspected the service on 1st March 2013 we found that the service was compliant across most of the regulations. People spoke well of the service and patients records were accurate and promptly available. However some records, relating to staff working in the service, were not available at the time of the inspection. We asked the provider for an action plan to address these areas and this was provided as agreed in June 2013.

At this inspection we followed up on the one area of non compliance with the regulations. We looked at the records provided, we spoke with the registered manager and one of the senior dentists. We did not seek the views of people who used the service as this had been part of the previous inspection in March.

1 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with people who use the services. They told us they had been happy with the service provided. Some comments were, '' the practice is clean, exemplary'' and '' very nice staff.'' People told us that they were satisfied with the service provided and that their dignity and privacy was respected.

Patient records and discussions with patients confirmed their needs had been assessed and personalised treatment plans developed. The equipment used at the practice was clean and the surrounding areas, such as waiting

room and treatment rooms were also clean

Patient's records were accurate and promptly available however we found some records relating to staff working in the service were not all maintained with full information to ensure people were protected from the risks of inappropriate care or treatment.