• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Nechells Dental Clinic

66 Rupert Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B7 5DT (0121) 359 1070

Provided and run by:
Dr. Kaivan Hashemi

All Inspections

29 April 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We previously inspected Nechells Dental Clinic on 12 December 2013. At the time we found that the cleanliness of the practice was satisfactory. However, action was required to ensure equipment used in the sterilisation of dental equipment was in good working order. We judged that this had a moderate impact on patients who used the service. We set compliance actions and told the provider to improve.

We also found that recruitment procedures were not robust. There was no reference for one newly employed member of staff. Staff spoken with said that they had received mandatory training. However there was no documentary evidence to demonstrate this. We were told that this was because staff kept their training certificates at home. At the time we judged that this had a minor impact on patients who used the service. We set compliance actions and told the provider to improve.

The provider sent us an action plan following our visit which recorded the action taken to address the issues raised.

At this inspection we spoke with the practice manager and the senior dental nurse. We also met with a dentist. We saw that issues identified in our previous inspection had now been addressed by the practice.

12 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection to check on the care and welfare of people using this service. Our inspection was discussed and arranged two days in advance. This was to ensure that we had time to see and speak with the staff working at the practice, as well as people registered with the service.

During the inspection we spoke with seven people who used the service, comments included, "Its fine here 'bab' I have no problems at all getting an appointment" and, "They have been so good to me".

People were provided with information about the practice and the treatments they needed because there were information leaflets available and notices on display in the reception area. People also had treatment plans explaining their agreed dental care.

Infection control procedures were in place, but the checks of equipment were not always recorded and instruments were not always stamped with a use by date.

The provider was not able to demonstrate good recruitment practice, this meant that appropriate checks of staff had not been carried out and there was not always evidence available of staff qualifications or training. We saw that staff meetings and appraisal of staff was undertaken, but supervision of staff was undertaken informally and not recorded.

The provider had systems in place to gain feedback from people using the service. We saw that regular checks were undertaken to assess and monitor the service provided.