Updated 15 March 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection team consisted of two adult social care inspectors.
Service and service type:
This service provides care and support to people living in ‘supported living’ settings including flats and houses with multiple occupation, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. in multiple occupation are properties where no more than five people in more than one household share communal areas. There are also facilities for staff to sleep in at night.
People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate the premises that are used for this inspection we looked at people's personal care and support. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
The inspection was announced. We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff. We needed to be sure that they would be in. We visited the office location to see the manager and to review care records and policies and procedures
What we did:
•With the permission of people who used the service we visited and spoke with seven of them in their own homes.
•Our inspection was informed by evidence we already held about the service. We also checked for feedback we received from members of the public, local authorities and clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).
•We asked the service to complete a Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
•We contacted three relatives and two social and healthcare professionals and spoke with two staff.
•We reviewed eight people's care records, staff personnel files, audits and other records about the management of the service.
•We requested additional evidence to be sent to us after our inspection. This was received and the information was used as part of our inspection.