• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Bolton Community Care Services DCA

134 Chorley New Road, Bolton, Lancashire, BL1 4NX (01204) 847644

Provided and run by:
Mears Homecare Limited

All Inspections

15 September 2014

During a routine inspection

During this inspection the Inspector gathered evidence to help answer our five key questions; Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

During the inspection we looked at respect and involvement, care and welfare, safeguarding, supporting workers and quality assurance.

This is a summary of what we found, using evidence obtained via speaking with staff, speaking with people who used the service and looking at records:

Is the service caring?

We spoke with six members of staff who all demonstrated a commitment to delivering good quality care and preserving people's dignity and privacy. Care records included evidence of individual support needs, appropriate risk assessments and personal preferences.

We spoke with five people who used the service. One person said, 'She (the carer) is lovely. I have her every day. As well as a carer she is a friend to me. I have no complaints'. Another told us, 'I have no complaints about them at all, I am happy with them. I class X (carer) as a friend'. Another commented, 'Before they go they always ask if there's anything else I want them to do. It's up to me. They always wear uniform and use gloves'.

One of the relatives commented, 'We've got quite friendly with them now. They seem well trained'. Another said, 'They ask what we would like them to do. They are all really pleasant and chatty and cheery'.

Is the service responsive?

People were visited prior to the commencement of the service to ascertain their individual needs and wishes. People's mental capacity was taken into consideration with regard to decision making and care was taken to ensure decisions were made in the person's best interests. Staff had undertaken Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) training and demonstrated a good understanding of the principles of the Act.

There was evidence within the care records that the service responded to people's changing needs and updated the support plans appropriately.

Is the service safe?

Risk assessments were in place in the care records and were reviewed and updated regularly to ensure people's needs were met safely.

Staff were aware of the safeguarding policies and guidance and were confident to follow them. We saw evidence that the service followed up safeguarding concerns appropriately.

Staff were recruited safely and efforts were made to ensure their suitability to work with vulnerable people, such as Disclosure and Barring (DBS) checks being carried out. Staff were well supported in their roles and felt confident to discuss any issues or concerns with management.

Is the service effective?

We spoke with six staff members who demonstrated a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities.

Feedback from questionnaires indicated a high level of satisfaction with the service delivery.

We spoke with five people who used the service and two relatives. They were happy with the service delivery and felt they were given choices, involved in the process and able to contribute to the support plan.

Is the service well-led?

There was a registered manager in place who was appropriately registered with CQC.

Staff had regular supervision and appraisals and were supported to raise any issues or concerns at any time. Staff meetings were held on a regular basis and regular updates and information given to staff via newsletters.

The quality assurance systems in evidence demonstrated a significant amount of monitoring, analysis and appropriate response to any shortfalls identified.

8 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the registered manager of the service who confirmed the process of registration with the Care Quality Commission had been completed.

Three clients of the service confirmed staff asked for permission before carrying out any activity. One person told us 'Staff always keep you informed and they are respectful and always knock on ther door and wait to enter".

We looked at eight clients care files. We saw they were clear, concise and provided staff with up to date information. We saw information including personal details, health and care information, care planning, risk assessments and evaluations. We saw staff had completed dates and times of visits.

During our inspection we looked at three staff files. We saw evidence there was a robust recruitment process. The service asked for references and carried out the required checks before the person started with the service. We saw an in depth induction programme was in place.

We saw the service co-operated with other providers to deliver safe and person centred care to their clients.

We found that Bolton Community Care Services had appropriate systems in place to effectively monitor the quality of the service provided

We spoke with staff. They told us 'The manager is very good, if there was a problem or a concern they were able to go to them'. Another person told us they were 'Happy, felt supported and listened to by the manager'.

18 October 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Domiciliary Care Services

We carried out a themed inspection looking at domiciliary care services. We asked people to tell us what it was like to receive services from this home care agency as part of a targeted inspection programme of domiciliary care agencies with particular regard to how people's dignity was upheld, and how they can make choices about their care.

We used telephone interviews and home visits to people who used the service and spoke with their main carers (a relative) to gain their views about the service. We spoke with 16 people, who either received a service from this care agency, or were main carers of someone who was receiving care. We visited the office and sampled a selection of 20 records and spoke with the manager of the service. We also spoke with five members of staff. We accompanied two of the care workers and observed as they visited people in their homes to provide care and support.

People who used the service spoke positively about the care workers and the care that they received. People said the care workers spoke in a respectful manner, were friendly but professional. Some of the comments included: 'I think the girls are great, I have no complaints at all', 'I feel that they do a great job', 'They are always pleasant and always make sure that I am ok' and 'I can't fault them, the only thing is I wish they could come every day, but that's not their fault'.

We spoke with four relatives of people that received care from the agency. One relative told us: 'I have nothing but praise and admiration for the girls that come to look after my wife, they are marvellous'. Another said 'The carer's do a great job; I have every confidence in them'. We were also told: 'They (the care workers) carry out their work efficiently'.

People told us that the care planned was implemented following their involvement. They said care plans reflected their care needs and included their likes, dislikes and preferences. One person told us: 'I was asked which name I would prefer to be called, they never shorten it and I think that's respectful'. Another said: 'They made sure that I only had a shower and asked how often I would like my hair washed'.

We spoke with staff who told us that they felt supported by their team leaders and managers. They said there were opportunities for training and development, which were appropriate to their roles and responsibilities. Staff told us: "I am happy here, I have done loads of training", "I do feel that I could speak with my line manager about anything", "The training is good and we have to pass any training before we can work", "I am not afraid to discuss anything with my team leader, but generally the girls I have worked with are great, we all work hard".

5 December 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that they felt involved in the planning of their care and they felt able to suggest changes when necessary. When we asked about the care workers people said "They're lovely. I'm well satisfied", "They look after me very, very well" and "I'd give them a halo". We heard that on the whole people had the same regular care worker and were informed if this changed for any reason. People said they had visits from managers within the company to make sure they were happy with the care they received.