• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Willows

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Halvarras Park, Playing Park, Truro, Cornwall, TR3 6HE (01872) 865588

Provided and run by:
Spectrum (Devon and Cornwall Autistic Community Trust)

All Inspections

31 August 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a focused inspection at The Willows on 31 August 2016, the inspection was unannounced. The previous inspection was an unannounced comprehensive inspection carried out on 22 September 2015. At that time we were concerned that the environment was not being adequately maintained and we made a recommendation in respect of this. The provider assured us improvements to the building were imminent.

In August 2016 we received concerns in relation to the environment, the availability of fresh food and cleaning products. As a result we planned this focused inspection to look specifically at these areas. During the inspection we also had concerns regarding staffing levels. This report only covers our findings in relation to those topics. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Willows on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

The Willows provides care and accommodation for up to three people who have autistic spectrum disorders. It is part of the Spectrum group who have several similar services in the county. At the time of the inspection two people were living at the service. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was no longer working at the service although they had not applied to cancel their registration at the time of the inspection. The divisional manager with oversight of The Willows was managing the service until it closed which was planned to take place by the end of September 2016. Spectrum had informed us of this short term arrangement.

Both people had been assessed as needing one to one support for ten hours a day. Evidence in rotas and staff signing in sheets showed that, over the previous seventeen days, there had only been four occasions when staffing levels had been at this commissioned level for the full ten hours. On seven days there had only been one member of staff on duty for the whole day. This impacted on people as both required one to one support in the community and a drop in staff levels meant they were unable to go out.

Planned improvements to the building had not been carried out due to a change in circumstances. The service was due to close in the next few weeks and both people living there were to move to different Spectrum locations. No improvements to the environment or furnishings had been made since the last inspection in September 2015.

People had access to fresh food and were able to make choices about what they ate. There was a good stock of cleaning products in place.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we have told the provider to take at the end of the full version of the report.

22 September 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected The Willows on 22 September 2015, the inspection was unannounced. The service was last inspected in May 2013, we had no concerns at that time.

The Willows provides care and accommodation for up to three people who have autistic spectrum disorders. At the time of the inspection two people were living at the service. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Changes to the building were being planned which would result in people having their own self- contained flats. This was viewed by all as a positive development which would help people develop their independence. However staff and relatives told us the planned changes had been put back several times and the environment and furnishings were beginning to look tired. One person said; “I know it’s only aesthetics but you want a certain standard maintained.” We have made a recommendation about maintaining the environment in the report.

Relatives told us they believed their family member was safe living at The Willows. They said if they had any concerns they would raise them directly with the registered manager who they found to be approachable.

Everyone considered the small size of the service and staff team to be an advantage. Staff told us they were a strong team who worked together well and were consistent in their approach to supporting people. Staff demonstrated a shared commitment to supporting people to access the local community and take part in a range of activities they enjoyed. One staff member commented; “They go out in the community and take part in the community. We try to get them to be more independent and enjoy themselves and they do!”

Staff knew people well and demonstrated a fondness and respect for them while talking with us. They spoke about people positively and emphasised their abilities and talents. We found they had a good knowledge of people’s routines and what was important to them.

People were involved as much as possible in the care planning process. Where people were assessed as not having capacity to make specific decisions best interest meetings were held involving families and other healthcare professionals. Applications to deprive people of their liberty in order to keep them safe had been made where appropriate.

Quality assurance systems were in place to help ensure the service was safe and any problems quickly identified and acted upon.

2 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We observed the two people who lived in the house. We saw from their behaviour that they were happy with the support they received. We observed staff interacting with people who used the service in a kind and calm manner. We saw that staff showed, through their actions, conversations and during discussions with us empathy and understanding towards the people they cared for.

There was evidence that people were supported to develop independent living skills. We observed one person hoovering and being supported to do the recycling. We saw another person helping to sweep the outside area.

We spoke to a relative who said, 'It's wonderful, the staff are so good. They keep you informed'.

We found that people who used the service were involved in making day to day decisions and participated in tasks at home, such as cooking, cleaning and doing their laundry. The records showed that they went out frequently and saw healthcare professionals when they needed to.

Staff told us that they felt there was sufficient staff on duty to allow them to support people effectively.

We saw that robust quality assurance processes were in place.

18 October 2012

During a routine inspection

One of the people who lived at The Willows indicated to us that they were happy with the care and support they received. A relative of another person told us that they were happy with the care provided and that staff knew and understood people really well. We observed that the staff had really good relationships with the people, and were able to communicate well. We saw that people took part in a range of activities both at home and in the community and that they were involved in decisions about how they spent their time.

The care plans were in the process of being re-written however we found that there was no agreements from multi professional teams around people being restrained or kept in their rooms, if they were distressed.

Staff were well supported and well trained.

The house was poorly maintained and people were exposed to unnecessary risks, for example chemicals were not properly stored. Checks were being made to ensure that the home is safe however these were not effective as they did not identify that people were not being kept safe.

18 January 2012

During a routine inspection

People living in the home had limited verbal communication skills. Those who we could verbally communicate with all intimated they were happy living in the home and they had no concerns about their care. From our observations people seemed happy living in the home, and there were positive interactions between staff and people using the service.