• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Charlotte James Care Home

Oakhurst, Shobnall Road, Burton On Trent, Staffordshire, DE14 2BB (01283) 569417

Provided and run by:
Four Seasons Homes No.4 Limited

All Inspections

17 July 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This inspection was unannounced which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were coming. At our last inspection on 3 April 2013 we made three compliance actions regarding the care and welfare of people using the service, capacity and consent and the staffing levels. This meant the provider had to make improvements and demonstrate they were fully protecting people using their service in these areas.

We found that suitable and sufficient improvements had been made where we had identified concerns. We saw the provider had put right what was required. This meant there were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and care was delivered in an effective and safe way.

We spoke with six people using the service, a visiting health care professional, four staff, four visitors and the manager. People told us that they were happy with the care they received. We saw that staff provided sensitive support and people were treated respectfully. One person said, 'The manner of staff is good. They are responsive and they come when needed.' A relative told us, 'I had no faith and no trust. It is now much better; it finally feels like there is a vision, commitment and leadership.'

We saw the home could demonstrate how arrangements to seek people's consent to care or treatment had been agreed in the person's best interests.

We saw there were sufficient staff available to meet the needs of the people using the service.

2 April 2013

During a routine inspection

This inspection was unannounced which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were coming. We spoke with seven people using the service, six visitors, five staff, the manager and the regional manager.

People using the service felt comfortable with the staff, one person told us, 'The staff are very pleasant, they are excellent and talk nicely'. People using the service liked the staff and felt they understood their needs.

Everyone we spoke with referred to a lack of staff and told us about the concerns they had as a result of this. One person told us, 'They are all lovely in their own way but they just don't have the time. I often have to wait but I know they will come as soon as they can'.

We saw information regarding capacity and consent was not always in place. This meant the home could not demonstrate how arrangements to seek people's consent to care or treatment had been agreed in the person's best interests.

Care records were in place but some of these lacked important information and clarity. This meant care treatment and support may not be delivered in a consistent way.

Staff received the training and support they required to ensure they could undertake their roles and responsibilities in a competent manner.

Systems were in place to ensure the home could monitor the quality of care delivered. The manager and regional manager told us they knew that changes were needed to address the current situation.

22 August 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced scheduled inspection in June 2012. During the inspection we made one compliance action about the staffing levels. This meant the home had to make improvements in this area. There was evidence to confirm the staff were unable to support everyone in a timely way. We looked at how people were being supported in the home and considered the number of staff available had a negative impact on people using the service.

This unannounced inspection was to look at the evidence available following an action plan received from the home, and to speak with people who used the service to see if improvements had been made. We found that the staffing levels had not been increased but following the recent recruitment of staff they were being increased from August 27 2012.

30 May 2012

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection to check on the care and welfare of people using this service. We visited Charlotte James in order to up date the information we hold and to establish that the needs of people using the service were being met. The visit was unannounced which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were coming. We spoke with six people using the service, five staff on duty and three visitors whilst we were there, and others afterwards on the telephone.

We found that people's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. The home was warm, clean and well maintained with no malodours. We saw people had the necessary equipment in place to provide a safe environment. Bedrooms were personalised and suitably furnished, and shared rooms offered screening. This meant people's privacy, dignity and independence were respected.

People spoke well of the home, one person told us, 'The staff are always polite and ask me what I want.' Another person using the service said, 'They let me know who they are and ask me what support I need.'

People we spoke with told us that staff were helpful and kind. We heard staff speak respectfully and it was clear from our observations that people reacted positively when the staff engaged with them. We observed staff providing support and saw people were treated with respect. Personal care issues were discussed sensitively and discreetly. We saw the staff listened to people and did not rush them.

There was evidence to confirm the staff were unable to support everyone in a timely way. We reviewed how people were being supported in the home and consider the number of staff available had a negative impact on people using the service. One person using the service said, 'I feel uncomfortable ringing the buzzer sometimes, I know they will be busy.' People we spoke with informed us they had to wait and we had to ask staff to assist a person during our visit. Relatives also offered us information regarding this issue.

We looked at how the home kept people safe, the people that we spoke with told us they were happy in the home. One person said, 'I feel safe here and can talk to the staff I am not afraid.'

We looked at ways in which the home assessed it own quality and safety and saw suitable systems were in place.