• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Welcome House - 68 Milton Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

68 Milton Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5LW (01635) 574644

Provided and run by:
Toqeer Aslam

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

16 June 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected this home on 16 June 2015. This was an unannounced inspection.

Welcome House - 68 Milton Road is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 3 people with mental health needs. The people who used the service lived with mental health disorders and needed support to understand their particular conditions; identify triggers for relapse; and learn coping strategies. At the time of our inspection, 2 people who lived in the home were fairly independent, hence required minimal support and therefore there were no requirement for 24 hours staffing.

There was a registered manager at the home. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected against the risk of abuse; they felt safe and staff recognised the signs of abuse or neglect and what to look out for. They understood their role and responsibilities to report any concerns and were confident in doing so.

The home had risk assessments in place to identify and reduce risks that may be involved when meeting people’s needs. There were risk assessments related to people’s mental health and details of how the risks could be reduced. This enabled the staff to take immediate action to minimise or prevent harm to people.

There were sufficient numbers of suitable staff to meet people’s needs and promote people’s safety. Staff had been provided with relevant training and they attended regular supervision and team meetings. Staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities and the lines of accountability within the home.

The registered manager followed safe recruitment practices to help ensure staff were suitable for their job role. Staff described the management as very open, supportive and approachable. Staff talked positively about their jobs.

We observed that staff had developed very positive relationships with the people who used the service. Staff were kind and respectful, we saw that they were aware of how to respect people’s privacy and dignity. People told us that they made their own choices and decisions, which were respected by staff but they found staff provided really helpful advice.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. The registered manager understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty safeguards and the home complied with these requirements.

The systems for the management of medicines were followed by staff and we found that people received their medicines safely. People had good access to health and social care professionals when required.

People were involved in assessment and care planning processes. Their support needs, likes and lifestyle preferences had been carefully considered and were reflected within the care and support plans available.

People were always motivated, encouraged and supported to be actively engaged in activities inside and outside of the home. For example, people went out to their local community at least five days of the week for activities and travel overseas for holidays.

Health action plans were in place and people had their physical and mental health needs regularly monitored. Regular reviews were held and people were supported to attend appointments with various health and social care professionals, to ensure they received treatment and support as required.

Staff meetings took place on a regular basis. Minutes were taken and any actions required were recorded and acted on. People’s feedback was sought and used to improve the care. People knew how to make a complaint and complaints were managed in accordance with the provider’s complaints policy.

The registered manager and provider regularly assessed and monitored the quality of care to ensure standards were met and maintained. The registered manager understood the requirements of their registration with the commission.

7 October 2013

During a routine inspection

There was one person living in the home. They told us they were happy living there. We saw that they were comfortable with the manager and staff who were supporting them. The atmosphere in the home was calm and relaxed.

People were treated with respect and their privacy and dignity was upheld.

People received support that was well planned and sensitively delivered.

People received the medicines they needed, when they needed it.

Robust recruitment and selection procedures ensured that people were supported by suitable staff.

Effective quality assurance procedures ensured that people were provided with a good service.

Overall we found that this service was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led and had achieved compliance.

11 October 2012

During a routine inspection

There were two people living in the home at the time of our visit. People lived semi independent lives with staff support during the day. They told us they enjoyed being independent and received all the support they needed. People said. "I like it here because it is semi independent. I get to cook my own food if I want to sometimes. I enjoy the food and I get more than enough support." "staff always do their best to help, and it works. Any problems are always sorted."

The service made sure people were able to make their own decisions about their care and treatment. We found that the care and support that people received was well planned and sensitively delivered. People were supported to eat a balanced and healthy diet, they were given choice and had their preferences taken into account. The home was clean throughout. Staff were given appropriate professional development to enable them to understand people's needs and provide appropriate care and support.