• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Green Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

92 Bath Road, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW3 3LN (020) 8630 1350

Provided and run by:
Dr Rupal Colleen D'Souza

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 14 September 2023

The Green Practice is located in the Heart of Hounslow Centre for Health, in the Hounslow area of West London at:

92 Bath Road

Hounslow

TW3 3LN

We visited this location as part of this inspection activity. The practice is in purpose-built premises. The premises is shared with other health services.

The provider is registered with CQC to deliver the Regulated Activities; Diagnostic and screening procedures, Maternity and midwifery services and Treatment of disease, disorder or injury.

The practice is situated within the North West London Integrated Care Board (ICB) and delivers General Medical Services (GMS) to a patient population of about 10,290. This is part of a contract held with NHS England.

The practice is part of the Hounslow Health Primary Care Network (PCN).

Information published by Public Health England shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the fifth decile (five of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others.

According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 58% Asian, 29% White, 6% Black, 3% Mixed, and 4% Other.

The majority of patients within the practice are of working age. The working age practice population is higher and the older people practice population is lower than the national average.

There is a principal GP and five locum GPs. Three GPs are female and three are male. The practice employs a practice nurse (10 hours per week), an advanced nurse practitioner (full-time) and a health care assistant. The principal GP is supported by a practice manager and a team of administrative and reception staff. A clinical pharmacist (employed by the primary care network) is working at the practice (four half days per week).

The practice is open between 8.00am to 6.30 pm Monday to Friday. The practice offers a range of appointment types including book on the day, telephone consultations and advance appointments.

Extended access is provided locally by the PCN, where late evening and weekend appointments are available. Out of hours services are provided by Practice Plus.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 14 September 2023

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Green Practice on 12 June 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Set out the ratings for each key question:

Safe - Requires improvement.

Effective - Good.

Caring - Good.

Responsive - Requires improvement.

Well-led - Requires improvement.

Following our previous inspection on 22 June 2022, the practice was rated requires improvement overall and for safe, responsive and well-led key questions. It was rated good for effective and caring key questions.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Green Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection to follow up on breaches of regulations from a previous inspection and follow up concerns reported to us.

This was a comprehensive inspection. At this inspection, we covered all key questions:

  • Are services safe?
  • Are services effective?
  • Are services caring?
  • Are services responsive?
  • Are services well-led?

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out by visiting the practice.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice demonstrated improvement in some areas, however, we found additional concerns and the practice was required to make further improvements.
  • There was a lack of good governance in some areas.
  • Recruitment checks including Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) were not always carried out in accordance with regulations.
  • The practice did not have any formal monitoring system in place to assure themselves that blank prescription forms were recorded correctly, and their use was monitored in line with national guidance.
  • Risks to patients were not assessed and well managed in relation to the fire evacuation plan, health and safety risk assessment and monitoring of the prescription box for uncollected prescriptions.
  • Some non-clinical staff we spoke with were not aware of emergency medicines and emergency equipment locations. Some staff could not explain the function and purpose of a defibrillator (a device that gives a high energy electric shock to the heart of someone who is in cardiac arrest).
  • Patients were not always able to access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • Policies were regularly reviewed but this did not include the author and approver details.
  • Our clinical records searches showed that the practice had effective systems in place to ensure the monitoring of high risk medicines and patients with long term conditions.
  • Patient treatment was regularly reviewed and updated.
  • There was evidence of quality improvement activity. Clinical audits were carried out.
  • Annual appraisals were carried out in a timely manner.
  • Staff had received training relevant to their role.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Complaints were managed in accordance with the provider’s protocols.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The Patient Participation Group (PPG) was active.

We found two breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

The provider should:

  • Continue to encourage and monitor childhood immunisation uptake rates.
  • Continue to identify carers in the practice population and ensure that these patients receive appropriate support and signposting.
  • Develop an effective system to monitor the requesting and collection of repeat prescriptions.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care