- Care home
Archived: Dalmuir Home
All Inspections
17 September 2013
During a routine inspection
People told us their room was not too hot or cold. They said their taps worked, the water was not too hot and they liked their rooms and the home.
People who used the service told us they had no complaints and would tell the manager or staff if they did.
One person said that they had no complaints and Dulmuir was like a home from home to them.
One person complained that they wanted a chair that would fit their frame and confidently complained about this to staff, who arranged to acquire a suitable chair for them
We saw that people's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. We saw that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that promoted people's safety and welfare.
We found that the provider was not always protecting people, by leaving areas unlocked and accessible to people that were required to be kept locked for people's safety or contained potential risks to people. For example, access to unknown medication, hazardous chemical products, sharp hazards, tripping hazards, fall hazards, fire hazards and security risks. They were also leaving areas presenting a risk to wanderers accessible and not fully assessing the need for window restrictors or fitting them as needed.
We saw that people were given support to make a comment or complaint where they needed assistance. People had their comments or complaints listened to and acted on, without the fear that they would be discriminated against for making a complaint.
20 September 2012
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We spoke with relatives of a person who used the service. They told us they were happy with the care provided, the care needs of their relative were discussed with them and their relative benefited from consistent staffing .
14 June 2012
During a routine inspection
We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.
We gathered evidence of people's experiences of the service by reviewing the most recent feedback surveys.
We observed many positive interactions between staff and people who use the service. Staff were seen to offer support and guidance in a sensitive, knowledgeable and caring manner.
We observed staff respecting people's right to privacy by knocking on their doors before entering. A person using the service received a health care consultation that was undertaken in the privacy of their bedroom.
A person using the service told us that they were happy with the care they that received.
People were supported to be able to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs. We observed that people were being offered additional drinks as well as coffee and tea. For people who required support with eating their meals staff were observed to sit beside people to assist them with their meal in a sensitive way.
We some information, which confirmed that some people using the service participated in house meetings to provide their views about the home. The records were available in formats, which people using the service would be able to understand.
A range of other accessible, easy read information was available to meet the needs of people using the service including, pictorial staff rotas, activity timetables, menus and the home's complaint's procedure. We observed that orientation prompts using pictures were provided throughout the home to assist people with dementia.