21 April 2016
During a routine inspection
The registered provider operates three services and we inspect all three services. Although the services are registered with the Care Quality Commission separately we found that there were areas that were common to all three services. For example, training programmes, staff meetings and one set of policies and procedures across all three services. For this reason some of the evidence we viewed was relevant to all three services. Our individual findings for St Catherine's Day Hospice -Whitby, St Catherine's Day Hospice- Ryedale and St Catherine's Hospice- Scarborough are discussed in individual reports.
St Catherine's Day Hospice- Whitby is run in an adapted bungalow in a residential area of Whitby. There was a large garden, patios and summer house for people to use. People who used the service had access to consultants and medical care, nursing care, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, social workers and spiritual support to meet their needs.
There was a registered manager employed for this service who also managed the main site, a hospice at home service and another day hospice. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was very experienced after being employed by the hospice for many years. The day to day running of this service was managed by a nursing sister employed by St Catherine’s Hospice Trust.
Staff followed risk assessments and guidance in risk management plans when providing care and support for people in order to maintain their safety.
Staff were able to describe what it meant to safeguard people and told us how they would report any suspected abuse. There were policies and procedures in place for staff to follow.
Staff recruitment processes were followed with the appropriate checks being carried out. There were sufficient staff on duty to meet people’s needs and the service had a team of volunteers who provided additional support. The hospice had a bank of staff who they could contact if they needed additional staff. All staff received supervision individually or as a group and annual appraisals were undertaken. New staff and volunteers received a thorough induction and regular training to ensure they had the knowledge and skills to deliver high quality care.
The environment was maintained by the hospice maintenance team. There were servicing agreements in place for mains services. The premises were clean and tidy with appropriate adaptations in place for people who used the service.
People brought their own medicines with them to the service and there were systems in place to ensure they were stored and administered safely.
Staff worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act where appropriate. People had choices about their care and their consent was sought by staff.
People were supported to receive a nutritious diet at the service. There was a choice of menu on the day we inspected and drinks and snacks were freely available.
When people needed specialist healthcare support the day hospice made referrals to specialist services such as occupational therapy or the dietician. People and their families could access advice and support through a helpline twenty four hours a day which linked directly to the hospice.
People told us that staff were caring and listened to them. There was a spiritual care co-ordinator who was available to people who used the day hospice and their families. This support was across all faiths but specific religious leaders could be accessed through the co-ordinator if a person preferred.
The seven protected characteristics of the Equality Act 2010; age, disability, gender, marital status, race, religion and sexual orientation were adequately provided for within the service. The care records we saw evidenced this and the staff who we spoke with displayed empathy in respect of people’s needs.
People were able to make decisions about the care and support that they received. They told us that staff at the service communicated well with them. Confidentiality, privacy and dignity was respected through the safe storage of records and by the staff who offered privacy when having difficult or sensitive conversations with people.
People helped develop their care plans which were person centred. This is when any treatment or care takes into account people's individual needs and preferences. The persons chosen place of care and place of death was clearly recorded where the person had chosen to share that information. People were given time and support to develop advanced care plans, advance directives and living wills if they wished. People received help with symptom control and management at the day hospice but could also enjoy socialising with others.
People were confident expressing any concerns to staff at the service and knew who to approach if they were not satisfied with the response.
Staff and volunteers shared similar values and worked closely with each other. There were regular team meetings for staff to feedback their views about the service. There was also a newsletter for staff and volunteers, a time out group for carers of people who used the service and a drop in group for newly bereaved relatives to provide support.
Accidents and incidents were clearly recorded. Where any mistakes were made these were discussed and reflected upon in order to make improvements.
The hospice presented annual quality accounts which looked at patient safety, clinical effectiveness and patient experience. They benchmarked their safety data against other hospices by engaging with a national initiative and audits were completed across the organisation providing a thorough and comprehensive system of quality assurance.
.