18 January 2018
During a routine inspection
Mrs Mollie Green 23 Parliament Street is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing care as single under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and care provided. We looked at both during this inspection.
At this inspection visit carried out on 18 January 2018 we found the service remained Good and met the all relevant fundamental standards. We found the registered provider continued to provide a good standard of care to people who lived at the home.
People who lived at the home were independent and could attend to their own care needs with minimum supervision. We saw that independence was promoted wherever possible at all times.
Staff told us they had known people who lived at the home for a considerable number of years prior to becoming paid employees. They said this contributed to positive relationships being developed and enabled person centred care to be delivered and achieved.
People who lived at the home told us they felt safe and secure whilst living at the home. Staffing was flexible and familiar staff could be called upon when people required assistance with additional unplanned support needs. People who lived at the home told us they were happy with the staffing levels.
Systems were in place to safeguard people from abuse and harassment. The registered provider had developed a person centred approach to risk. Risks were assessed and safety of people was monitored by staff on an ongoing basis.
People who lived at the home told us they were treated with kindness and respect. We observed support being delivered in a sensitive and timely manner. Privacy and dignity was routinely considered by staff.
We reviewed medicines administration and documentation and found this to be safe. People’s skills were taken into consideration and independence was promoted when people were assessed as having the necessary skills to manage their own medicines.
People were encouraged to live active lives. There was a focus on promoting healthy lives through exercise and healthy eating. Cultural needs were identified and addressed by the registered provider. Relationships were encouraged and supported.
We saw evidence of multi-agency working to promote effective care. Health needs were identified and managed with support from staff who worked at the home. We saw evidence of good practice guidelines being referred to when supporting people with specific mental health conditions.
People who lived at the home told us the quality and availability of food was good. People were offered choices to meet their preferences and dietary needs.
We carried out a visual inspection of the home and found it was clean, tidy and appropriately maintained.
People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice. Consent to care and treatment was routinely sought.
People we spoke with told us they were happy with the service and had no formal complaints. During the inspection visit one person commented on how the service could improve. We saw action was taken immediately by the registered manager to ensure improvements were put into place straight away. People were encouraged to discuss and raise any concerns with a member of the staff team on an individual basis.
People who lived at the home told us the service was well led. Staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities and were supported by the registered manager. The registered manager understood the importance of their role and offered advice and guidance to staff working at the home to ensure safe and effective care and support was provided.
People we spoke with and relatives were happy with the service being provided and spoke fondly of the staff team and the registered manager. There was no formal internal quality assurance in place but informal checks were made routinely by all members of the staff team.
Further information is in the detailed findings below.