13 December 2016
During a routine inspection
The registered manager was present during our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.
The management of infection control and prevention and the cleanliness of the environment did not protect people from the risk of harm. Staff knew how to protect people and reduce risks associated with their specific conditions but this information was not always reflected in people’s care records. In some areas of the home the environment would be safer if the removal of clutter were improved. Staff were not consistent with their explanations of the fire procedure. People living at the home told us that they felt supported by staff to keep them safe. Staff had a good working knowledge of how to report any potential safeguarding concerns.
Staff told us that they had received most training required in order to meet the needs of the people they supported. People told us they were offered a choice of meals, but the menus provided were repetitive and lacked variety. People were supported to access healthcare professionals but some records lacked sufficient guidance to ensure people’s health needs were consistently met.
People spoke to us about how genuinely caring and kind staff were towards them. We observed some caring and compassionate practice and staff demonstrated a positive regard for the people they were supporting. People told us they felt involved in decisions about how they wanted their care and support provided and felt listened to. Assessments had been completed to determine people’s capacity to make certain decisions. People said that the staff who supported them maintained their privacy and dignity. People told us that they knew how to complain.
People told us that they were involved in the planning of their care but had not been involved in reviews. Some people and their relatives told us that activities at the home were limited and people were not supported to access their local communities as much as they wanted. There was little evidence to demonstrate how the provider ensured appropriate support and stimulation for people who lived with dementia. We recommend that the service explores the relevant guidance on how to make environments more ‘dementia friendly’ and how to provide meaningful stimulation to people who live with dementia.
We found that whilst there were some systems in place to monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service provided, these were not always effective in ensuring the service was consistently improving and compliant with the regulations. Feedback received had not been analysed to identify trends and to prevent re-occurrence of negative experiences for people. People spoke positively and with warmth about the caring and supportive nature of the registered provider.
You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.